Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews.

Copas JB, Shi JQ.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2001 Aug;10(4):251-65.

PMID:
11491412
2.

Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias.

Henmi M, Copas JB, Eguchi S.

Biometrics. 2007 Jun;63(2):475-82.

PMID:
17688500
3.

A robust P-value for treatment effect in meta-analysis with publication bias.

Copas JB, Malley PF.

Stat Med. 2008 Sep 20;27(21):4267-78. doi: 10.1002/sim.3284.

PMID:
18384185
4.

[Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].

Timmer A.

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(3):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 2. German.

PMID:
21530909
5.

Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.

Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, Sutton AJ.

Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):88-95.

PMID:
11914301
6.

Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.

Bennett DA, Latham NK, Stretton C, Anderson CS.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;57(4):349-57.

PMID:
15135835
7.

In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.

Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;58(9):894-901.

PMID:
16085192
8.

The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.

Vavken P, Dorotka R.

J Orthop Sci. 2011 Mar;16(2):238-44. doi: 10.1007/s00776-011-0040-8. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

PMID:
21360256
9.
10.

Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.

Simmonds M.

Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 11;4:24. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0004-8.

11.

Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.

Rücker G, Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G.

Biom J. 2011 Mar;53(2):351-68. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000151. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

PMID:
21374698
12.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

13.

Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.

Carpenter J, Rücker G, Schwarzer G.

Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):1066-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01498.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

PMID:
21039395
14.

Publication bias and meta-analyses: a practical example.

Burdett S, Stewart LA, Tierney JF.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Winter;19(1):129-34.

PMID:
12701945
15.

Systematic reviews of meta-analyses: applications and limitations.

Delgado-Rodríguez M.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Feb;60(2):90-2. No abstract available.

16.

Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.

Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L.

Stat Med. 2007 Nov 10;26(25):4544-62.

PMID:
17476644
17.

Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.

Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Stanley TD, Abrams KR, Peters JL, Cooper NJ.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jan 12;9:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-2.

18.

How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Leucht S, Kissling W, Davis JM.

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01388.x. Review.

PMID:
19469725
19.

Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.

Biljana M, Jelena M, Branislav J, Milorad R.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;68:323-8.

PMID:
10724898
20.

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity.

Stuck AE, Rubenstein LZ, Wieland D.

BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):469; author reply 470-1. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Support Center