Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 222

1.

The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences.

Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Johnson T, Shaver A.

Bioessays. 2000 Dec;22(12):1057-66. Review.

PMID:
11084621
2.

Adaptive evolution of asexual populations under Muller's ratchet.

Bachtrog D, Gordo I.

Evolution. 2004 Jul;58(7):1403-13.

PMID:
15341144
3.

Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria.

Denamur E, Matic I.

Mol Microbiol. 2006 May;60(4):820-7. Review.

4.
5.

Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution.

Taddei F, Radman M, Maynard-Smith J, Toupance B, Gouyon PH, Godelle B.

Nature. 1997 Jun 12;387(6634):700-2.

PMID:
9192893
6.
7.
8.

Evolutionarily stable mutation rates.

Dawson KJ.

J Theor Biol. 1998 Sep 7;194(1):143-57.

PMID:
9778430
9.

Environmental heterogeneity enhances clonal interference.

Campos PR, Neto PS, de Oliveira VM, Gordo I.

Evolution. 2008 Jun;62(6):1390-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00380.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.

PMID:
18363863
10.

Rate of adaptive peak shifts with partial genetic robustness.

Kim Y.

Evolution. 2007 Aug;61(8):1847-56.

PMID:
17683428
11.

The evolution of gene duplicates.

Otto SP, Yong P.

Adv Genet. 2002;46:451-83. Review.

PMID:
11931235
12.

Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli.

Kibota TT, Lynch M.

Nature. 1996 Jun 20;381(6584):694-6.

PMID:
8649513
13.

Local effects of limited recombination: historical perspective and consequences for population estimates of adaptive evolution.

Williford A, Comeron JM.

J Hered. 2010 Mar-Apr;101 Suppl 1:S127-34. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esq012. Review.

PMID:
20421321
14.

Insight into the genetic bases of climatic adaptation in experimentally evolving wheat populations.

Rhoné B, Remoué C, Galic N, Goldringer I, Bonnin I.

Mol Ecol. 2008 Feb;17(3):930-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03619.x. Epub 2008 Jan 9.

PMID:
18194164
15.

A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation.

Garcia de Leaniz C, Fleming IA, Einum S, Verspoor E, Jordan WC, Consuegra S, Aubin-Horth N, Lajus D, Letcher BH, Youngson AF, Webb JH, Vøllestad LA, Villanueva B, Ferguson A, Quinn TP.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):173-211. Review.

PMID:
17437557
16.
17.

Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.

Keightley PD, Otto SP.

Nature. 2006 Sep 7;443(7107):89-92.

PMID:
16957730
18.

Limits to adaptation in asexual populations.

de Visser JA, Rozen DE.

J Evol Biol. 2005 Jul;18(4):779-88. Review.

19.

Population consequences of mutagenesis and antimutagenesis.

Crow JF.

Basic Life Sci. 1986;39:519-30.

PMID:
3767853
20.

Why sex and recombination?

Barton NH, Charlesworth B.

Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):1986-90. Review.

PMID:
9748151

Supplemental Content

Support Center