Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 333

1.

Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.

Thornton A, Lee P.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):207-16. Review.

PMID:
10729693
2.

Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.

Formann AK.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 May 19.

PMID:
18586577
3.

Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.

Jennions MD, Møller AP.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 May;77(2):211-22. Review.

PMID:
12056747
4.

Is there bias in the publication of individual patient data meta-analyses?

Tierney JF, Clarke M, Stewart LA.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Spring;16(2):657-67.

PMID:
10932430
5.

Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):864-9. Review.

6.

Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.

Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, Sutton AJ.

Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):88-95.

PMID:
11914301
7.
8.

Is grey literature essential for a better control of publication bias in psychiatry? An example from three meta-analyses of schizophrenia.

Martin JL, Pérez V, Sacristán M, Alvarez E.

Eur Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;20(8):550-3. Epub 2005 Jul 1.

PMID:
15994063
9.

Assessing publication bias in meta-analysis.

Soeken KL, Sripusanapan A.

Nurs Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;52(1):57-60.

PMID:
12552177
10.

Review articles and publication bias.

Kleijnen J, Knipschild P.

Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 May;42(5):587-91.

PMID:
1388359
11.

Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.

Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G, Rücker G, Künstler R.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):624-631.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

PMID:
19282148
12.

Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?

Machan C, Ammenwerth E, Bodner T.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:957-62.

PMID:
17108634
13.

In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.

Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;58(9):894-901.

PMID:
16085192
14.

Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.

Borm GF, Donders AR.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):825-830.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.010. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

PMID:
19136233
15.

Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.

Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L.

Stat Med. 2007 Nov 10;26(25):4544-62.

PMID:
17476644
16.

Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research.

Begg CB, Berlin JA.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Jan 18;81(2):107-15.

PMID:
2642556
17.

Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.

Bennett DA, Latham NK, Stretton C, Anderson CS.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;57(4):349-57.

PMID:
15135835
18.

Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.

Mahid SS, Qadan M, Hornung CA, Galandiuk S.

Br J Surg. 2008 Aug;95(8):943-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6302. Review.

PMID:
18618864
19.

A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology.

De Vito C, Manzoli L, Marzuillo C, Anastasi D, Boccia A, Villari P.

Vaccine. 2007 Dec 17;25(52):8794-806. Epub 2007 Nov 5. Review.

PMID:
18035456
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center