Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 175

1.

A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools.

Steadman HJ, Silver E, Monahan J, Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Mulvey EP, Grisso T, Roth LH, Banks S.

Law Hum Behav. 2000 Feb;24(1):83-100.

PMID:
10693320
2.

Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.

Harris GT, Rice ME, Camilleri JA.

J Interpers Violence. 2004 Sep;19(9):1063-74.

PMID:
15296617
3.

Are violence risk assessment tools clinically useful?

Carroll A.

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;41(4):301-7.

PMID:
17464716
4.

Actuarial risk assessment models: a review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments.

Sreenivasan S, Kirkish P, Garrick T, Weinberger LE, Phenix A.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2000;28(4):438-48. Review.

PMID:
11196254
5.

Threat assessment: defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence.

Borum R, Fein R, Vossekuil B, Berglund J.

Behav Sci Law. 1999;17(3):323-37. Review.

PMID:
10481132
6.

Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk.

Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Appelbaum PS, Robbins PC, Mulvey EP, Silver E, Roth LH, Grisso T.

Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;176:312-9.

7.

Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: ethical considerations.

Campbell TW.

Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(2):269-79. Review.

PMID:
12645049
8.

Assessing violence risk in stalking cases: a regression tree approach.

Rosenfeld B, Lewis C.

Law Hum Behav. 2005 Jun;29(3):343-57.

PMID:
15965632
9.

Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician agreement and decision making.

Zoe Hilton N, Carter AM, Harris GT, Sharpe AJ.

J Interpers Violence. 2008 Feb;23(2):171-88.

PMID:
18162635
10.

The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions.

Scurich N, John RS.

Law Hum Behav. 2011 Apr;35(2):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9218-4.

PMID:
20145984
11.

Cues they use: clinicians' endorsement of risk cues in predictions of dangerousness.

Odeh MS, Zeiss RA, Huss MT.

Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(2):147-56.

PMID:
16557618
12.

Examining the science and practice of violence risk assessment with female adolescents.

Odgers CL, Moretti MM, Reppucci ND.

Law Hum Behav. 2005 Feb;29(1):7-27. Review.

PMID:
15865330
13.
14.
15.

Assessment of violence risk in youth for juvenile court: relevant factors for clinical judgment.

Duits N, Doreleijers TA, van den Brink W.

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Jun-Jul;31(3):236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Jun 5.

PMID:
18538397
16.

[Statistical prediction methods in violence risk assessment and its application].

Liu YY, Hu JM, Yang M, Li XS.

Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Jun;29(3):216-21. Review. Chinese.

PMID:
24303769
17.

[Assessment and management of the risk for violence. An overview of the literature].

Tholen AJ.

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2009;51(3):173-82. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
19536973
19.

Risk communication: clinicians' reported approaches and perceived values.

Heilbrun K, Philipson J, Berman L, Warren J.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1999;27(3):397-406.

PMID:
10509939
20.

Identifying three types of violent offenders and predicting violent recidivism while on probation: a classification tree analysis.

Stalans LJ, Yarnold PR, Seng M, Olson DE, Repp M.

Law Hum Behav. 2004 Jun;28(3):253-71.

PMID:
15264446

Supplemental Content

Support Center