Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 86

1.

Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions.

Pawłowski B, Dunbar RI.

Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Feb 7;266(1416):281-5.

2.

Sexual partnership patterns as a behavioral risk factor for sexually transmitted diseases.

Finer LB, Darroch JE, Singh S.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Sep-Oct;31(5):228-36.

3.

Trading height for education in the marriage market.

Ponzo M, Scoppa V.

Am J Hum Biol. 2015 Mar-Apr;27(2):164-74. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22629.

PMID:
25280116
4.

Equilibrium population dynamics when mating is by mutual choice based on age.

Alpern S, Katrantzi I, Ramsey D.

Theor Popul Biol. 2014 Jun;94:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2013.01.001.

PMID:
23541396
5.

Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice.

Bereczkei T, Voros S, Gal A, Bernath L.

Ethology. 1997 Aug;103(8):681-99.

PMID:
12293453
6.
7.

Family size and sex preferences and eventual fertility in Botswana.

Campbell EK, Campbell PG.

J Biosoc Sci. 1997 Apr;29(2):191-204.

PMID:
9881130
8.

Men's, but not women's, sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces.

Kandrik M, Fincher CL, Jones BC, DeBruine LM.

Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Jul;43(5):965-71. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0202-1.

PMID:
24366658
9.

Young women's preferences for market work: responses to marital events.

Spitze GD, Waite LJ.

Res Popul Econ. 1981;3:147-66.

PMID:
12265058
10.

Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.

O'Connor JJ, Jones BC, Fraccaro PJ, Tigue CC, Pisanski K, Feinberg DR.

Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Oct;43(7):1343-53. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0298-y.

PMID:
24830906
11.
12.

Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.

Gobrogge KL, Perkins PS, Baker JH, Balcer KD, Breedlove SM, Klump KL.

Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Oct;36(5):717-23.

PMID:
17674179
13.

The evolutionary psychology of human mating: a response to Buller's critique.

Klasios J.

Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2014 Sep;47 Pt A:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.05.001.

PMID:
24927270
14.

Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.

Li NP, Yong JC, Tov W, Sng O, Fletcher GJ, Valentine KA, Jiang YF, Balliet D.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov;105(5):757-76. doi: 10.1037/a0033777.

PMID:
23915041
15.

Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.

Quist MC, Watkins CD, Smith FG, Little AC, Debruine LM, Jones BC.

Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Dec;41(6):1415-21. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9848-8.

PMID:
21882053
16.

Reproductive ambition predicts partnered, but not unpartnered, women's preferences for masculine men.

Watkins CD.

Br J Psychol. 2012 Aug;103(3):317-29. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02076.x.

PMID:
22804699
17.

The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Bonduriansky R.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):305-39. Review.

PMID:
11569787
19.

Evolution of human mate choice.

Geary DC, Vigil J, Byrd-Craven J.

J Sex Res. 2004 Feb;41(1):27-42. Review.

PMID:
15216422
20.

Human mate guarding.

Buss DM.

Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2002 Dec;23 Suppl 4:23-9. Review.

PMID:
12496732

Supplemental Content

Support Center