Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 86

1.
2.

Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.

Cobby M, Browning J, Jones A, Whipp E, Goddard P.

Br J Radiol. 1990 Sep;63(753):673-9.

PMID:
2205326
3.

Staging of advanced cervical carcinoma using MRI-predictors of outcome after radical radiotherapy.

Taylor MB, Carrington BM, Davidson SE, Swindell R, Lawrance JA.

Clin Radiol. 2003 Jul;58(7):532-41.

PMID:
12834636
4.

Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical carcinoma and comparison with spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Yang WT, Walkden SB, Ho S, Cheung TH, Lam SK, Teo J, Metreweli C.

Br J Radiol. 1996 Jul;69(823):610-6.

PMID:
8696696
5.

Value of magnetic resonance imaging with an endovaginal receiver coil in the pre-operative assessment of Stage I and IIa cervical neoplasia.

deSouza NM, McIndoe GA, Soutter WP, Krausz T, Chui KM, Hughes C, Mason WP.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 May;105(5):500-7.

PMID:
9637118
6.

Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.

Wagenaar HC, Trimbos JB, Postema S, Anastasopoulou A, van der Geest RJ, Reiber JH, Kenter GG, Peters AA, Pattynama PM.

Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Sep;82(3):474-82.

PMID:
11520143
7.

Pretreatment tumour volume measurement on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of survival in cervical cancer.

Soutter WP, Hanoch J, D'Arcy T, Dina R, McIndoe GA, DeSouza NM.

BJOG. 2004 Jul;111(7):741-7.

8.
9.
10.

Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.

Ho CM, Chien TY, Jeng CM, Tsang YM, Shih BY, Chang SC.

J Formos Med Assoc. 1992 Oct;91(10):982-90.

PMID:
1362678
11.

[Caring for stage IB cancer of the cervix. Proposal for a protocol based on a review of the literature].

Aubard Y, Genet D, Philippe HJ.

Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003 Jan;31(1):2-13. Review. French.

PMID:
12659779
12.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the measurement of clinical stage IB cervical carcinoma.

Innocenti P, Fiumicelli D, Agostini S, Savino L, Taddei G, Santoni R, Villari N.

Eur J Radiol. 1996 Nov;23(3):222-7.

PMID:
9003929
13.

Correlation of clinical and MRI staging in cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy: a single-center experience.

Engin G, Küçücük S, Ölmez H, Haşıloğlu ZI, Dişçi R, Aslay I.

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011 Mar;17(1):44-51. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3114-09.1. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

14.
15.

Transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of presence, size and extent of invasive cervical cancer.

Testa AC, Ludovisi M, Manfredi R, Zannoni G, Gui B, Basso D, Di Legge A, Licameli A, Di Bidino R, Scambia G, Ferrandina G.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;34(3):335-44. doi: 10.1002/uog.7325.

16.

Association between developmental steps in the organogenesis of the uterine cervix and locoregional progression of cervical cancer: a prospective clinicopathological analysis.

Höckel M, Hentschel B, Horn LC.

Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):445-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70060-9. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

PMID:
24656439
17.

Prognostic factors for local and distant recurrence in stage I and II cervical carcinoma.

Werner-Wasik M, Schmid CH, Bornstein L, Ball HG, Smith DM, Madoc-Jones H.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1309-17.

PMID:
7635770
18.

The negative predictive value of clinical examination with or without anesthesia versus magnetic resonance imaging for parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer stages IB1 to IIA.

Bleker SM, Bipat S, Spijkerboer AM, van der Velden J, Stoker J, Kenter GG.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jan;23(1):193-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31827a4ad8.

PMID:
23221736
19.

Carcinoma of the cervix: predictive value of clinical and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging assessment of prognostic factors.

Hricak H, Quivey JM, Campos Z, Gildengorin V, Hindmarsh T, Bis KG, Stern JL, Phillips TL.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993 Nov 15;27(4):791-801.

PMID:
8244807
20.

Tumor diameter/volume and pelvic node status assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for uterine cervical cancer treated with irradiation.

Toita T, Kakinohana Y, Shinzato S, Ogawa K, Yoshinaga M, Iraha S, Higashi M, Sakumoto K, Kanazawa K, Sawada S.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Mar 1;43(4):777-82.

PMID:
10098432

Supplemental Content

Support Center