Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 194

1.

Attentional shift by gaze is triggered without awareness.

Sato W, Okada T, Toichi M.

Exp Brain Res. 2007 Oct;183(1):87-94. Epub 2007 Jul 12.

PMID:
17624520
2.

Neural mechanisms underlying conscious and unconscious attentional shifts triggered by eye gaze.

Sato W, Kochiyama T, Uono S, Toichi M.

Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.061. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

3.

Spatiotemporal commonalities of fronto-parietal activation in attentional orienting triggered by supraliminal and subliminal gaze cues: An event-related potential study.

Uono S, Sato W, Sawada R, Kochiyama T, Toichi M.

Biol Psychol. 2018 Jul;136:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 4.

PMID:
29733867
4.

Eye gaze triggers reflexive attention shifts: evidence from lateralised ERPs.

Feng Q, Zhang X.

Brain Res. 2014 Nov 17;1589:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.029. Epub 2014 Sep 18.

PMID:
25241361
5.

Perception of static eye gaze direction facilitates subsequent early visual processing.

Schuller AM, Rossion B.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 May;115(5):1161-8.

PMID:
15066541
6.

Making eye contact without awareness.

Rothkirch M, Madipakkam AR, Rehn E, Sterzer P.

Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 29.

PMID:
26133642
7.

Gaze-induced joint attention persists under high perceptual load and does not depend on awareness.

Xu S, Zhang S, Geng H.

Vision Res. 2011 Sep 15;51(18):2048-56. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.023. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

8.

Attentional shifts by gaze direction in voluntary orienting: evidence from a microsaccade study.

Yokoyama T, Noguchi Y, Kita S.

Exp Brain Res. 2012 Nov;223(2):291-300. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3260-z. Epub 2012 Sep 23.

9.

Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.

Hietanen JK, Leppänen JM, Nummenmaa L, Astikainen P.

Brain Res. 2008 Jun 18;1215:123-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.091. Epub 2008 Apr 13.

PMID:
18485332
10.

Eye gaze cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows).

Galfano G, Dalmaso M, Marzoli D, Pavan G, Coricelli C, Castelli L.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(10):1895-910. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.663765. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

PMID:
22512343
11.

Neural activity associated with attention orienting triggered by gaze cues: A study of lateralized ERPs.

Holmes A, Mogg K, Garcia LM, Bradley BP.

Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(3):285-95. doi: 10.1080/17470910903422819. Epub 2010 Feb 15.

PMID:
20162493
12.

Involvement of medial temporal structures in reflexive attentional shift by gaze.

Okada T, Sato W, Kubota Y, Usui K, Inoue Y, Murai T, Hayashi T, Toichi M.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008 Mar;3(1):80-8. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm027. Epub 2007 Jun 29.

13.

Automatic attentional orienting to other people's gaze in schizophrenia.

Langdon R, Seymour K, Williams T, Ward PB.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1549-1558. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1192658. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

PMID:
27207190
14.

The eyes have it!: an fMRI investigation.

Kingstone A, Tipper C, Ristic J, Ngan E.

Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):269-71.

PMID:
15177792
15.
16.

Differential activation of frontoparietal attention networks by social and symbolic spatial cues.

Engell AD, Nummenmaa L, Oosterhof NN, Henson RN, Haxby JV, Calder AJ.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Dec;5(4):432-40. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq008. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

17.

The whereabouts of visual attention: Involuntary attentional bias toward the default gaze direction.

Nakashima R, Kumada T.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Aug;79(6):1666-1673. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1332-7.

PMID:
28500508
18.

Eyes only? Perceiving eye contact is neither sufficient nor necessary for attentional capture by face direction.

Böckler A, van der Wel RP, Welsh TN.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Sep;160:134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

PMID:
26245915
19.

The anti-orienting phenomenon revisited: effects of gaze cues on antisaccade performance.

Wolohan FD, Crawford TJ.

Exp Brain Res. 2012 Sep;221(4):385-92. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3180-y. Epub 2012 Jul 14.

PMID:
22797785
20.

How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.

Nummenmaa L, Hietanen JK.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1738-54. doi: 10.1037/a0016472.

PMID:
19968432

Supplemental Content

Support Center