Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from Books

Items: 1 to 20 of 188

1.

Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.

Nadler RB, Casey JT, Zhao LC, Navai N, Smith ZL, Zhumkhawala A, Macejko AM.

J Robot Surg. 2010 Jan;3(4):201-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0162-6.

PMID:
27628630
2.

Urinary incontinence in men after formal one-to-one pelvic-floor muscle training following radical prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the prostate (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials.

Glazener C, Boachie C, Buckley B, Cochran C, Dorey G, Grant A, Hagen S, Kilonzo M, McDonald A, McPherson G, Moore K, Norrie J, Ramsay C, Vale L, N'Dow J.

Lancet. 2011 Jul 23;378(9788):328-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60751-4. Erratum in: Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):412.

PMID:
21741700
3.

Great meaningless questions in urology: which is better, open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy?

Vickers AJ.

Urology. 2011 May;77(5):1025-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.054. No abstract available.

4.

Prostate-specific antigen testing rates remain low in UK general practice: a cross-sectional study in six English cities.

Williams N, Hughes LJ, Turner EL, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Neal DE, Martin RM, Metcalfe C.

BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108(9):1402-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10163.x.

5.

EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Schmid HP, Van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F, Heidenreich A.

Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):572-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.025.

PMID:
21315502
6.

Focal therapy in the management of localized prostate cancer.

Nguyen CT, Jones JS.

BJU Int. 2011 May;107(9):1362-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09975.x. Review.

7.

First 500 cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from a single UK centre: learning curves of two surgeons.

Sharma NL, Papadopoulos A, Lee D, McLoughlin J, Vowler SL, Baumert H, Warren AY, Patil V, Shah N, Neal DE.

BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(5):739-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09941.x.

8.

Early prostate cancer--which treatment do men prefer and why?

Anandadas CN, Clarke NW, Davidson SE, O'Reilly PH, Logue JP, Gilmore L, Swindell R, Brough RJ, Wemyss-Holden GD, Lau MW, Javle PM, Ramani VA, Wylie JP, Collins GN, Brown S, Cowan RA; North West Uro-oncology Group..

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1762-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09833.x.

9.

Development and validation of preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence within 5 years after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Kattan MW, Yu C, Salomon L, Vora K, Touijer K, Guillonneau B.

Urology. 2011 Feb;77(2):396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.013.

PMID:
20970840
10.

The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study.

Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, de La Taille A, Salomon L, Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Janetschek G, Nassar F, Turk I, Vanni AJ, Gill IS, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, Martinez Pineiro L, Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P, Bjartell A, Jiborn T, Eden C, Richards AJ, Van Velthoven R, Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Su LM, Pavlovich CP, Levinson AW, Touijer KA, Vickers A, Guillonneau B.

J Urol. 2010 Dec;184(6):2291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.003.

11.

Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up.

Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, Lane Z, Peabody JO, Rogers CG, Sammon J, Siddiqui SA, Diaz M.

Eur Urol. 2010 Dec;58(6):838-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.010.

PMID:
20869162
12.

International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling.

Samaratunga H, Montironi R, True L, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, Humphrey PA, van der Kwast T, Wheeler TM, Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Egevad L; ISUP Prostate Cancer Group..

Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):6-15. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.178. Review.

13.

New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.

Barbash GI, Glied SA.

N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):701-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006602. No abstract available.

14.

International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume.

van der Kwast TH, Amin MB, Billis A, Epstein JI, Griffiths D, Humphrey PA, Montironi R, Wheeler TM, Srigley JR, Egevad L, Delahunt B; ISUP Prostate Cancer Group..

Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):16-25. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.156. Review.

15.

Laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a case-control study at a single institution.

Grossi FS, Di Lena S, Barnaba D, Larocca L, Raguso M, Sallustio G, Raguso N.

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010 Jun;82(2):109-12.

PMID:
20812535
16.
17.

International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins.

Tan PH, Cheng L, Srigley JR, Griffiths D, Humphrey PA, van der Kwast TH, Montironi R, Wheeler TM, Delahunt B, Egevad L, Epstein JI; ISUP Prostate Cancer Group..

Mod Pathol. 2011 Jan;24(1):48-57. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.155.

18.

A cost-analysis comparison of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy: the McMaster Institute of Urology experience.

Al-Shaiji TF, Kanaroglou N, Thom A, Prowse C, Comondore V, Orovan W, Piercey K, Whelan P, Winter L, Matsumoto ED.

Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Aug;4(4):237-41.

19.

Improvements in robot-assisted prostatectomy: the effect of surgeon experience and technical changes on oncologic and functional outcomes.

Samadi DB, Muntner P, Nabizada-Pace F, Brajtbord JS, Carlucci J, Lavery HJ.

J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1105-10. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0136.

PMID:
20624081
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center