Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from Books

Items: 1 to 20 of 36

1.

AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):491-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

PMID:
19540721
2.

Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.

Drummond MF, Schwartz JS, Jönsson B, Luce BR, Neumann PJ, Siebert U, Sullivan SD.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Summer;24(3):244-58; discussion 362-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080343.

PMID:
18601792
3.

The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?

Shrier I, Boivin JF, Platt RW, Steele RJ, Brophy JM, Carnevale F, Eisenberg MJ, Furlan A, Kakuma R, Macdonald ME, Pilote L, Rossignol M.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 May 21;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-19.

4.

Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews.

Mrkobrada M, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Haynes RB, Iansavichus AV, Rehman F, Garg AX.

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jul;3(4):1102-14. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04401007. Epub 2008 Apr 9.

5.

Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.

Shrier I, Boivin JF, Steele RJ, Platt RW, Furlan A, Kakuma R, Brophy J, Rossignol M.

Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Nov 15;166(10):1203-9. Epub 2007 Aug 21.

PMID:
17712019
6.

Circular instead of hierarchical: methodological principles for the evaluation of complex interventions.

Walach H, Falkenberg T, Fønnebø V, Lewith G, Jonas WB.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jun 24;6:29.

7.

Extending the evidence hierarchy to enhance evidence-based practice for substance use disorders.

Tucker JA, Roth DL.

Addiction. 2006 Jul;101(7):918-32. Review.

PMID:
16771885
8.

Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions.

Norris SL, Atkins D.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1112-9. Review.

PMID:
15968036
9.

Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures.

Hartling L, McAlister FA, Rowe BH, Ezekowitz J, Friesen C, Klassen TP.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. Review.

PMID:
15968035
10.

Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms.

Chou R, Helfand M.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1090-9. Review.

PMID:
15968034
11.

Challenges in systematic reviews of economic analyses.

Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T, Lohr KN, Teutsch S, Mandelblatt J.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1073-9. Review.

PMID:
15968032
12.

Challenges in systematic reviews that evaluate drug efficacy or effectiveness.

Santaguida PL, Helfand M, Raina P.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1066-72. Review.

PMID:
15968031
13.

Challenges in systematic reviews: synthesis of topics related to the delivery, organization, and financing of health care.

Bravata DM, McDonald KM, Shojania KG, Sundaram V, Owens DK.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1056-65. Review.

PMID:
15968030
14.

Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.

Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, Lau J.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. Review.

PMID:
15968029
15.

Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine topics.

Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Suttorp MJ, Buscemi N, Friesen C; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1042-7. Review.

PMID:
15968028
16.

Better information for better health care: the Evidence-based Practice Center program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Atkins D, Fink K, Slutsky J; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; North American Evidence-based Practice Centers.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1035-41. Review.

PMID:
15968027
17.

Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations.

Glasgow RE, Magid DJ, Beck A, Ritzwoller D, Estabrooks PA.

Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):551-7.

PMID:
15908849
18.

Using evidence reports: progress and challenges in evidence-based decision making.

Helfand M.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):123-7.

19.

Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery.

Kotaska A.

BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):1039-42. Review. No abstract available. Erratum in: BMJ. 2004 Dec 11;329(7479):1385.

20.

Evidence based medicine has come a long way.

Guyatt G, Cook D, Haynes B.

BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):990-1. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Support Center