Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 20;11(1):e0146450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146450. eCollection 2016.

Performance of Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Malaria and Human African Trypanosomiasis by Diagnostic Laboratories in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Results of a Nation-Wide External Quality Assessment.

Author information

1
National Institute of Biomedical Research, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
2
University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
3
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
4
Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
5
National Malaria Control Program, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
6
National Human African Trypanosomiasis Control Program, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
7
University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
8
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Abstract

The present External Quality Assessment (EQA) assessed microscopy of blood parasites among diagnostic laboratories in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The EQA addressed 445 participants in 10/11 provinces (October 2013-April 2014). Participants were sent a panel of five slides and asked to return a routinely stained slide which was assessed for quality of preparation and staining. Response rate was 89.9% (400/445). For slide 1 (no parasites), 30.6% participants reported malaria, mostly Plasmodium falciparum. Only 11.0% participants reported slide 2 (Plasmodium malariae) correctly, 71.0% reported "malaria" or "Plasmodium falciparum" (considered acceptable). Slide 3 contained Plasmodium falciparum (109/μl) and Trypanosoma brucei brucei trypomastigotes: they were each reported by 32.5% and 16.5% participants respectively, 6.0% reported both. Slide 4 (Trypanosoma) was recognised by 44.9% participants. Slide 5 (Plasmodium ovale) was correctly reported by 6.2% participants, another 68.8% replied "malaria" or "Plasmodium falciparum" (considered acceptable). Only 13.6% of routine slides returned were correctly prepared and stained. The proportion of correct/acceptable scores for at least 4/5 slides was higher among EQA-experienced participants compared to first time participants (40.9% versus 22.4%, p = 0.001) and higher among those being trained < 2 years ago compared to those who were not (42.9% versus 26.3%, p = 0.01). Among diagnostic laboratories in Democratic Republic of the Congo, performance of blood parasite microscopy including non-falciparum species and Trypanosoma was poor. Recent training and previous EQA participation were associated with a better performance.

PMID:
26788725
PMCID:
PMC4720473
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0146450
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center