Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 25

1.

Assessment of browsed plants in a sub-tropical forest frontier by means of fuzzy inference.

Dechnik-Vázquez YA, García-Barrios L, Ramírez-Marcial N, van Noordwijk M, Alayón-Gamboa A.

J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 15;236:163-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.071. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

PMID:
30731241
2.

Animal thermal comfort indexes in silvopastoral systems with different tree arrangements.

Pezzopane JRM, Nicodemo MLF, Bosi C, Garcia AR, Lulu J.

J Therm Biol. 2019 Jan;79:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.12.015. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

PMID:
30612670
3.

A pilot study on the foraging behaviour of heifers in intensive silvopastoral and monoculture systems in the tropics.

Améndola L, Solorio FJ, Ku-Vera JC, Améndola-Massioti RD, Zarza H, Mancera KF, Galindo F.

Animal. 2019 Mar;13(3):606-616. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118001532. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

PMID:
29983122
4.

Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration by agroforestry systems in southeastern Brazil.

Torres CMME, Jacovine LAG, Nolasco de Olivera Neto S, Fraisse CW, Soares CPB, de Castro Neto F, Ferreira LR, Zanuncio JC, Lemes PG.

Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 1;7(1):16738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16821-4.

5.

Differential Haematobia irritans infestation levels in beef cattle raised in silvopastoral and conventional pasture systems.

de S Oliveira MC, Nicodemo MLF, Gusmão MR, Pezzopane JRM, Bilhassi TB, Santana CH, Gonçalves TC, Rabelo MD, Giglioti R.

Vet Parasitol. 2017 Nov 15;246:96-99. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

PMID:
28969788
6.

Farmers' Preferences for PES Contracts to Adopt Silvopastoral Systems in Southern Ecuador, Revealed Through a Choice Experiment.

Raes L, Speelman S, Aguirre N.

Environ Manage. 2017 Aug;60(2):200-215. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0876-6. Epub 2017 May 4.

PMID:
28474210
7.

The potential of L. scoparium, K. robusta and P. radiata to mitigate N-losses in silvopastural systems.

Esperschuetz J, Balaine N, Clough T, Bulman S, Dickinson NM, Horswell J, Robinson BH.

Environ Pollut. 2017 Jun;225:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.042. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

PMID:
28343100
8.

Silvopastoral systems of the Chol Mayan ethnic group in southern Mexico: Strategies with a traditional basis.

Pignataro AG, Levy Tacher SI, Aguirre Rivera JR, Nahed Toral J, González Espinosa M, Rendón Carmona N.

J Environ Manage. 2016 Oct 1;181:363-373. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.036. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

PMID:
27393943
9.

Sewage sludge stabilisation and fertiliser value in a silvopastoral system developed with Eucalyptus nitens Maiden in Lugo (Spain).

Mosquera-Losada MR, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Daboussi S, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A.

Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:806-815. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 28.

PMID:
27243933
10.

The influence of trees on the thermal environment and behaviour of grazing heifers in Brazilian Midwest.

Lopes LB, Eckstein C, Pina DS, Carnevalli RA.

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016 Apr;48(4):755-61. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1021-x. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

PMID:
26894499
11.

Social behaviour of cattle in tropical silvopastoral and monoculture systems.

Améndola L, Solorio FJ, Ku-Vera JC, Améndola-Massiotti RD, Zarza H, Galindo F.

Animal. 2016 May;10(5):863-7. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115002475. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

PMID:
26621331
12.

Reviving wood-pastures for biodiversity and people: A case study from western Estonia.

Roellig M, Sutcliffe LM, Sammul M, von Wehrden H, Newig J, Fischer J.

Ambio. 2016 Mar;45(2):185-95. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0719-8. Epub 2015 Oct 12.

13.

[Avifauna in silvopastoral systems in the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor, Tabasco, México].

González-Valdivia N, Barba-Macías E, Hernández-Daumás S, Ochoa-Gaona S.

Rev Biol Trop. 2014 Sep;62(3):1031-52. Spanish.

PMID:
25412535
14.

Role of litter turnover in soil quality in tropical degraded lands of Colombia.

León JD, Osorio NW.

ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 13;2014:693981. doi: 10.1155/2014/693981. eCollection 2014. Review.

15.

[Diversity of birds in the Agricultural Center Cotové, Santa Fe de Antioquia, Colombia].

Martínez-Bravo CM, Mancera-Rodríguez NJ, Buitrago-Franco G.

Rev Biol Trop. 2013 Dec;61(4):1597-617. Spanish.

PMID:
24432522
16.

Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals.

Broom DM, Galindo FA, Murgueitio E.

Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 25;280(1771):20132025. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2025. Print 2013 Nov 22. Review.

17.

Trade-offs between cattle production and bird conservation in an agricultural frontier of the Gran Chaco of Argentina.

Mastrangelo ME, Gavin MC.

Conserv Biol. 2012 Dec;26(6):1040-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01904.x. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

PMID:
22862688
18.

Sewage sludge fertiliser use: implications for soil and plant copper evolution in forest and agronomic soils.

Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Mosquera-Losada MR.

Sci Total Environ. 2012 May 1;424:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.042. Epub 2012 Mar 16.

PMID:
22425275
19.
20.

Soil carbon storage as influenced by tree cover in the Dehesa cork oak silvopasture of central-western Spain.

Howlett DS, Moreno G, Mosquera Losada MR, Nair PK, Nair VD.

J Environ Monit. 2011 Jul;13(7):1897-904. doi: 10.1039/c1em10059a. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

PMID:
21643613

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center