Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 2344

1.

Give every paper a read for reproducibility.

Winchester C.

Nature. 2018 May;557(7705):281. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05140-x. No abstract available.

PMID:
29769684
2.

Make codes for research integrity practical.

Hiney M.

Nature. 2018 Apr;556(7702):436. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-04899-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
29695850
3.

Ethical considerations of researchers conducting pediatric clinical drug trials: a qualitative survey in two Belgian university children's hospitals.

Van Hoof W, Meesters K, Dossche L, Christiaens D, De Bruyne P, Vande Walle J.

Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jul;177(7):1003-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3151-9. Epub 2018 Apr 21.

PMID:
29679141
4.

Research integrity among PhD students within clinical research at the University of Southern Denmark.

Jensen LB, Kyvik KO, Leth-Larsen R, Eriksen MB.

Dan Med J. 2018 Apr;65(4). pii: A5469.

PMID:
29619924
5.

[Recent Progress in Promoting Research Integrity].

Tanaka S.

Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(4):477-486. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.17-00181-4. Review. Japanese.

6.

Ethical aspects in medical publishing in Belgium.

Moreels TG.

Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2018 Jan-Mar;81(1):45-48.

PMID:
29562377
7.

Gråzonen mellan forskning och försök bör förklaras bättre.

Gahrton G.

Lakartidningen. 2017 Nov 23;114. pii: EXFM. Swedish. No abstract available.

8.

Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review.

Trace S, Kolstoe SE.

BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Nov 28;18(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0224-7.

9.

Beyond Nazi War Crimes Experiments: The Voluntary Consent Requirement of the Nuremberg Code at 70.

Annas GJ.

Am J Public Health. 2018 Jan;108(1):42-46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304103. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

PMID:
29161060
10.

American Doctors at the Nuremberg Medical Trial.

Shuster E.

Am J Public Health. 2018 Jan;108(1):47-52. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304104. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

PMID:
29161059
11.

Enhancing patients' autonomy by involving them in research ethics committees.

Rakic M, Dittrich T, Elger BS, Shaw D.

Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Nov 1;29(7):896-900. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx128.

PMID:
29077835
12.

Big Data and Health Research-The Governance Challenges in a Mixed Data Economy.

Holm S, Ploug T.

J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Dec;14(4):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9810-0. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

PMID:
28980135
13.

Problematic protocols: An overview of medical research protocols not approved by the LUMC medical ethics review committee.

Tersmette DG, Engberts DP.

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):52-57. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1231721. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

PMID:
28949866
14.

[The large bowel cancer lottery].

Hofmann B.

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Sep 18;137(17). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0617. Print 2017 Sep 19. Norwegian. No abstract available.

15.

A qualitative feasibility study to inform a randomised controlled trial of fluid bolus therapy in septic shock.

O'Hara CB, Canter RR, Mouncey PR, Carter A, Jones N, Nadel S, Peters MJ, Lyttle MD, Harrison DA, Rowan KM, Inwald D, Woolfall K.

Arch Dis Child. 2018 Jan;103(1):28-32. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312515. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

16.

Trends in the number and the quality of trial protocols involving children submitted to a French Institutional Review Board.

Gautier I, Janiaud P, Rollet N, André N, Tsimaratos M, Cornu C, Malik S, Gentile S, Kassaï B.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0395-4.

17.

[New Royal Decree on clinical trials: main implications for emergency medicine physicians who do research].

García Arenillas M, Haj-Ali Saflo O, Sáenz de Tejada M.

Emergencias. 2017 Jun;29(3):194-201. Spanish.

18.

Spanish Validation of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research Interview for Assessing Patients' Mental Capacity to Consent to Clinical Research.

Baón-Pérez BS, Álvarez-Marrodán I, Navío-Acosta M, Verdura-Vizcaíno EJ, Ventura-Faci T.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Dec;12(5):343-351. doi: 10.1177/1556264617720755. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

PMID:
28814135
19.

Maximising value from a United Kingdom Biomedical Research Centre: study protocol.

Greenhalgh T, Ovseiko PV, Fahy N, Shaw S, Kerr P, Rushforth AD, Channon KM, Kiparoglou V; Partnerships for Health, Wealth and Innovation cross-cutting theme of the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Aug 14;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0237-1.

20.

The UK Mental Capacity Act and consent to research participation: asking the right question.

Willner P.

J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan;44(1):44-46. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103996. Epub 2017 Aug 5.

PMID:
28780523

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center