Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 204

1.

Patient-Specific Simulation of Cardiac Blood Flow From High-Resolution Computed Tomography.

Lantz J, Henriksson L, Persson A, Karlsson M, Ebbers T.

J Biomech Eng. 2016 Dec 1;138(12). doi: 10.1115/1.4034652.

PMID:
27618494
2.

A patient-specific virtual stenotic model of the coronary artery to analyze the relationship between fractional flow reserve and wall shear stress.

Lee KE, Kim GT, Lee JS, Chung JH, Shin ES, Shim EB.

Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;222:799-805. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.153. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

PMID:
27522378
3.

Dynamically scaled phantom phase contrast MRI compared to true-scale computational modeling of coronary artery flow.

Beier S, Ormiston JA, Webster MW, Cater JE, Norris SE, Medrano-Gracia P, Young AA, Cowan BR.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Oct;44(4):983-92. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25240. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

PMID:
27042817
4.

Open-loop (feed-forward) and feedback control of coronary blood flow during exercise, cardiac pacing, and pressure changes.

Pradhan RK, Feigl EO, Gorman MW, Brengelmann GL, Beard DA.

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016 Jun 1;310(11):H1683-94. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00663.2015. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

5.

A reason why visual-functional mismatch happens: Insights from mathematical models.

Saito N.

Int J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;206:61-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.074. Epub 2016 Jan 6. No abstract available.

PMID:
26774834
6.

A mathematical model for the vessel recruitment in coronary microcirculation in the absence of active autoregulation.

Saracco A, Bauckneht M, Verna E, Ghiringhelli S, Repetto R, Sambuceti G, Provasoli S, Storace M.

Microvasc Res. 2016 Mar;104:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

PMID:
26638880
7.

Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling Using Coronary Angiographic Vessel Morphology Versus Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve.

Tröbs M, Achenbach S, Röther J, Redel T, Scheuering M, Winneberger D, Klingenbeck K, Itu L, Passerini T, Kamen A, Sharma P, Comaniciu D, Schlundt C.

Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 1;117(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

PMID:
26596195
8.

Fractal regional myocardial blood flows pattern according to metabolism, not vascular anatomy.

Yipintsoi T, Kroll K, Bassingthwaighte JB.

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016 Feb 1;310(3):H351-64. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00632.2015. Epub 2015 Nov 20.

9.

A Comparison of Theory-Based and Experimentally Determined Myocardial Signal Intensity Correction Methods in First-Pass Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Fluckiger JU, Benefield BC, Bakhos L, Harris KR, Lee DC.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:843741. doi: 10.1155/2015/843741. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

10.

A model-based reconstruction technique for quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.

Tran-Gia J, Lohr D, Weng AM, Ritter CO, Stäb D, Bley TA, Köstler H.

Magn Reson Med. 2016 Sep;76(3):880-7. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25921. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

PMID:
26414857
11.

A reduced-dimensional model for near-wall transport in cardiovascular flows.

Hansen KB, Shadden SC.

Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2016 Jun;15(3):713-22. doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0719-4. Epub 2015 Aug 23.

12.

Theoretical Model of Coronary Blood Flow Regulation: Role of Myocardium Compressive Forces.

Xie X, Wang Y.

Microcirculation. 2015 Nov;22(8):677-86. doi: 10.1111/micc.12221.

PMID:
26193350
13.

A PBPK model describing a xenobiotic with a short PK event scale.

Wang X, Davies BE.

J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015 Aug;42(4):409-16. doi: 10.1007/s10928-015-9425-1. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

PMID:
26156591
14.

Measurement and modeling of coronary blood flow.

Sinclair MD, Lee J, Cookson AN, Rivolo S, Hyde ER, Smith NP.

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;7(6):335-56. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1309. Epub 2015 Jun 30. Review.

PMID:
26123867
15.

Effects of aortic irregularities on blood flow.

Prahl Wittberg L, van Wyk S, Fuchs L, Gutmark E, Backeljauw P, Gutmark-Little I.

Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2016 Apr;15(2):345-60. doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0692-y. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

16.

Noninvasive mathematical analysis of spectral electrocardiographic components for coronary lesions of intermediate to obstructive stenosis severity-relationship with classic and functional SYNTAX score.

Takeshita M, Shinoda N, Takashima H, Kurita A, Ando H, Harada K, Uetani T, Gosho M, Murohara T, Amano T.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;86(1):21-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25924. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

PMID:
25824322
17.

Support with intra-aortic balloon pump vs. Impella2.5® and blood flow to the heart, brain and kidneys - an experimental porcine model of ischaemic heart failure.

Møller-Helgestad OK, Poulsen CB, Christiansen EH, Lassen JF, Ravn HB.

Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 15;178:153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.153. Epub 2014 Oct 25.

PMID:
25464241
18.

Transient blood flow in elastic coronary arteries with varying degrees of stenosis and dilatations: CFD modelling and parametric study.

Wu J, Liu G, Huang W, Ghista DN, Wong KK.

Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;18(16):1835-45. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2014.976812. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

PMID:
25398021
19.

Improved spillover correction model to quantify myocardial blood flow by 11C-acetate PET: comparison with 15O-H 2O PET.

Mori Y, Manabe O, Naya M, Tomiyama Y, Yoshinaga K, Magota K, Oyama-Manabe N, Hirata K, Tsutsui H, Tamaki N, Katoh C.

Ann Nucl Med. 2015 Jan;29(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s12149-014-0904-z. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

PMID:
25209232
20.

Computational fluid dynamics analysis of balloon-expandable coronary stents: influence of stent and vessel deformation.

Martin DM, Murphy EA, Boyle FJ.

Med Eng Phys. 2014 Aug;36(8):1047-56. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

PMID:
24953569

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center