Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Best matches for sucralose:

Critical review of the current literature on the safety of sucralose. Magnuson BA et al. Food Chem Toxicol. (2017)

Plasma concentrations of sucralose in children and adults. Sylvetsky AC et al. Toxicol Environ Chem. (2017)

Sucralose Non-Carcinogenicity: A Review of the Scientific and Regulatory Rationale. Berry C et al. Nutr Cancer. (2016)

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 631

1.

Insight into the Dynamics of Different Fluorophores in the Interior of Aerosol OT Lamellar Structures in Presence of Sugars: From Picosecond-to-Femtosecond Study.

Dutta R, Ghosh M, Pyne A, Sarkar N.

J Phys Chem B. 2018 Dec 13. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b10609. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30543430
2.

The not-so-sweet effects of sucralose on blood sugar control.

Pepino MY.

Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Sep 1;108(3):431-432. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy205. No abstract available.

PMID:
30535110
3.

Sucralose decreases insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects: a randomized controlled trial.

Romo-Romo A, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Brito-Córdova GX, Gómez-Díaz RA, Almeda-Valdes P.

Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Sep 1;108(3):485-491. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy152.

PMID:
30535090
4.

Dietary sugars and non-caloric sweeteners elicit different homeostatic and hedonic responses in the brain.

van Opstal AM, Kaal I, van den Berg-Huysmans AA, Hoeksma M, Blonk C, Pijl H, Rombouts SARB, van der Grond J.

Nutrition. 2018 Sep 13;60:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.09.004. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30529886
5.

Exploratory Investigation of Intestinal Function and Bacterial Translocation After Focal Cerebral Ischemia in the Mouse.

Oyama N, Winek K, Bäcker-Koduah P, Zhang T, Dames C, Werich M, Kershaw O, Meisel C, Meisel A, Dirnagl U.

Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 19;9:937. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00937. eCollection 2018.

6.

Kinetics and modeling of artificial sweeteners degradation in wastewater by the UV/persulfate process.

Fu Y, Wu G, Geng J, Li J, Li S, Ren H.

Water Res. 2018 Nov 20;150:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.051. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30503870
7.

Identification and quantification of 19 pharmaceutical active compounds and metabolites in hospital wastewater in Cameroon using LC/QQQ and LC/Q-TOF.

Mayoudom EVT, Nguidjoe E, Mballa RN, Tankoua OF, Fokunang C, Anyakora C, Blackett KN.

Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Nov 14;190(12):723. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-7097-1.

PMID:
30430263
8.

Autoimmune Thyroiditis with Hypothyroidism Induced by Sugar Substitutes.

Sachmechi I, Khalid A, Awan SI, Malik ZR, Sharifzadeh M.

Cureus. 2018 Sep 7;10(9):e3268. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3268.

9.

Factors that affect polychlorinated naphthalenes formation and distribution during the heating of sucralose.

Dong S, Liu G, Li X.

Food Chem. 2019 Mar 15;276:397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.050. Epub 2018 Oct 10. No abstract available.

PMID:
30409611
10.

Temporal variability of parasites, bacterial indicators, and wastewater micropollutants in a water resource recovery facility under various weather conditions.

Tolouei S, Burnet JB, Autixier L, Taghipour M, Bonsteel J, Duy SV, Sauvé S, Prévost M, Dorner S.

Water Res. 2019 Jan 1;148:446-458. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.068. Epub 2018 Oct 28.

PMID:
30408731
11.

Evaluating a chemical source-tracing suite for septic system nitrate in household wells.

Nitka AL, DeVita WM, McGinley PM.

Water Res. 2019 Jan 1;148:438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.019. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

PMID:
30408730
12.
13.

A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.

Wee M, Tan V, Forde C.

Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11). pii: E1632. doi: 10.3390/nu10111632.

14.

Activation of the sweet taste receptor T1R3 by sucralose attenuates VEGF-induced vasculogenesis in a cell model of the retinal microvascular endothelium.

Lizunkova P, Enuwosa E, Chichger H.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 23. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4157-8. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30353220
15.

Impact of on-site wastewater infiltration systems on organic contaminants in groundwater and recipient waters.

Gao Q, Blum KM, Gago-Ferrero P, Wiberg K, Ahrens L, Andersson PL.

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):1670-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

PMID:
30317168
16.

Enhanced Gastrointestinal Passive Paracellular Permeability Contributes to the Obesity-associated Hyperoxaluria.

Bashir M, Meddings J, Alshaikh A, Jung D, Le K, Amin R, Ratakonda S, Sharma S, Granja I, Satti M, Asplin J, Hassan H.

Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018 Oct 11. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00266.2018. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30307745
17.

Sources and trends of artificial sweeteners in coastal waters in the bay of Cadiz (NE Atlantic).

Baena-Nogueras RM, Traverso-Soto JM, Biel-Maeso M, Villar-Navarro E, Lara-Martín PA.

Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Oct;135:607-616. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.069. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

PMID:
30301079
18.

Measuring Artificial Sweeteners Toxicity Using a Bioluminescent Bacterial Panel.

Harpaz D, Yeo LP, Cecchini F, Koon THP, Kushmaro A, Tok AIY, Marks RS, Eltzov E.

Molecules. 2018 Sep 25;23(10). pii: E2454. doi: 10.3390/molecules23102454.

19.

Contaminants of Emerging Concern as novel groundwater tracers for delineating wastewater impacts in urban and peri-urban areas.

McCance W, Jones OAH, Edwards M, Surapaneni A, Chadalavada S, Currell M.

Water Res. 2018 Dec 1;146:118-133. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 6. Review.

PMID:
30241045
20.

Quantitative comparison of adsorption and desorption of commonly used sweeteners in the oral cavity.

Bülbül G, Celli GB, Zaferani M, Raghupathi K, Galopin C, Abbaspourrad A.

Food Chem. 2019 Jan 15;271:577-580. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.221. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

PMID:
30236718

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center