Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 42

1.

Cyclic fatigue resistance of waveone gold, protaper next and 2shape nickel titanium rotary instruments using a reliable method for measuring temperature.

Olcay K, Eyuboglu TF, Erkan E.

Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;22(10):1335-1340. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_655_18.

PMID:
31607721
2.

Effect of sodium hypochlorite on the cyclic fatigue resistance: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation.

Ertuğrul İF.

Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Oct 1. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23381. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31574200
3.

A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education.

Çelik G, Özdemir Kısacık F, Yılmaz EF, Mersinlioğlu A, Ertuğrul İF, Orhan H.

PeerJ. 2019 Aug 19;7:e7419. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7419. eCollection 2019.

4.

Torsional resistance of three ProTaper rotary systems.

Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Abualjadayel B, Alanazi M, Alkhalifah A, Jamleh A.

BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0820-7.

5.

Cyclic fatigue resistance of three rotary file systems in a dynamic model after immersion in sodium hypochlorite.

Palma PJ, Messias A, Cerqueira AR, Tavares LD, Caramelo F, Roseiro L, Santos JM.

Odontology. 2019 Jul;107(3):324-332. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0401-2. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

PMID:
30542934
6.

An in vitro cyclic fatigue resistance comparison of conventional and new generation nickel-titanium rotary files.

Ruiz-Sánchez C, Faus-Matoses V, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses I, Faus-Llácer VJ.

J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):e805-e809. doi: 10.4317/jced.55091. eCollection 2018 Aug.

7.

A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the shaping ability of three thermally-treated nickel-titanium rotary file systems in curved canals.

Huang Z, Quan J, Liu J, Zhang W, Zhang X, Hu X.

J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):325-334. doi: 10.1177/0300060518801451. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

8.

Effects of Different Irrigation Solutions on Root Fracture Resistance: An in Vitro Study.

Lantigua Domínguez MC, Feliz Pedrinha V, Oliveira Athaide da Silva LC, Soares Ribeiro ME, Loretto SC, de Almeida Rodrigues P.

Iran Endod J. 2018 Summer;13(3):367-372. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i3.19247.

9.

Fatigue Resistance of New and Used Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: a Comparative Study.

Gambarini G, Miccoli G, Seracchiani M, Morese A, Piasecki L, Gaimari G, Di Nardo D, Testarelli L.

Clin Ter. 2018 May-Jun;169(3):e96-e101. doi: 10.7417/T.2018.2061.

10.

Resistance to fracture of teeth instrumented using novel EndoStar E5 rotary versus ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne file systems.

Pawar AM, Pawar MG, Thakur B, Banga KS, Luke AM.

J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;21(1):52-56. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_216_16.

11.

Alternating versus continuous rotation: Root canal transportation and centering ratio with the ProTaper Next.

González-Chapela J, Castelo-Baz P, Varela-Patiño P, Martín-Biedma B, Ruíz-Piñón M.

J Conserv Dent. 2017 Jul-Aug;20(4):255-259. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_299_16.

12.

Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Incidence of Root Dentin Defects.

Borges ÁH, Damião MS, Pereira TM, Filho GS, Miranda-Pedro FL, Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa W, Piva E, Guedes OA.

J Endod. 2018 Feb;44(2):286-291. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

PMID:
29208400
13.

Mechanical Properties of Various Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments.

Goo HJ, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Pedullà E, Kim HC.

J Endod. 2017 Nov;43(11):1872-1877. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

PMID:
28951028
14.

Analysis of Surface Characteristics of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next Instruments by Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Bennett J, Chung KH, Fong H, Johnson J, Paranjpe A.

J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jul 1;9(7):e879-e885. doi: 10.4317/jced.54049. eCollection 2017 Jul.

15.

Influence of continuous rotation or reciprocation of Optimum Torque Reverse motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.

Pedullà E, Corsentino G, Ambu E, Rovai F, Campedelli F, Rapisarda S, La Rosa GR, Rapisarda E, Grandini S.

Int Endod J. 2018 May;51(5):522-528. doi: 10.1111/iej.12769. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

PMID:
28329416
16.

Laboratory comparison of the mechanical properties of TRUShape with several nickel-titanium rotary instruments.

Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE.

Int Endod J. 2017 Aug;50(8):805-812. doi: 10.1111/iej.12700. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

PMID:
27616210
17.

Evaluation of the Effect of Rotary Systems on Stresses in a New Testing Model Using a 3-Dimensional Printed Simulated Resin Root with an Oval-shaped Canal: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

Eken R, Sen OG, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S.

J Endod. 2016 Aug;42(8):1273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

PMID:
27372160
18.

Resistance to torsional failure and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and Mtwo files in continuous and reciprocating motion: An in vitro study.

Varghese NO, Pillai R, Sujathen UN, Sainudeen S, Antony A, Paul S.

J Conserv Dent. 2016 May-Jun;19(3):225-30. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.181937.

19.

In Vitro Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of ProTaper Next, HyFlex CM, OneShape, and ProTaper Universal Instruments in a Canal with a Double Curvature.

Topçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G, Akti A, Düzgün S.

J Endod. 2016 Jun;42(6):969-71. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

PMID:
27091353
20.

Lacking evidence for performance of implants used for proximal femoral fractures - A systematic review.

Nyholm AM, Palm H, Malchau H, Troelsen A, Gromov K.

Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):586-94. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 13. Review.

PMID:
26803696

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center