Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1147-55. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181ed114e. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

Review article: improving outcome after major surgery: pathophysiological considerations.

Author information

1
Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern CH-3010, Switzerland.

Abstract

Surgical and anesthesia-related techniques may reduce physical stress for patients undergoing high-risk surgery, but major surgery is increasingly performed in patients with substantial comorbidities. Strategies for improving the outcome for such patients include approaches that both increase tissue oxygen delivery and reduce metabolic demand. However, these strategies have produced conflicting results. To understand the success and failure of attempts to improve postoperative outcome, the pathophysiology of perioperative hemodynamic, metabolic, and immunological alterations should be analyzed. Our aim in this review is to provide a survey of fields of opportunities for improving outcome after major surgery. The issues are approached from 3 different angles: the view of the patient, the view of the surgical intervention, and the view of the anesthesia. Special attention is also given to what could be considered the result of the interaction among the 3: perioperative inflammation and immune response.

PMID:
20736438
DOI:
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181ed114e
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center