Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 32

1.

Reliability and accuracy of a method of adjustment for self-measurement of auditory thresholds.

Van Tasell DJ, Folkeard P.

Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318278c05d.

PMID:
23202154
2.

Stuart Gatehouse: the international perspective.

Van Tasell DJ, Levitt H.

Trends Amplif. 2008 Jun;12(2):80-4. doi: 10.1177/1084713808316174.

3.

SII and fit-to-target analysis of compression system performance as a function of number of compression channels.

Woods WS, Van Tasell DJ, Rickert ME, Trine TD.

Int J Audiol. 2006 Nov;45(11):630-44.

PMID:
17118906
4.

The role of high-CF fibers in speech perception: comments on Horwitz et al. (2002).

Strickland EA, Viemeister NF, Van Tasell DJ, Preminger JE.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Jul;116(1):49-50. No abstract available.

PMID:
15295963
5.

Hearing aid troubleshooting based on patients' descriptions.

Jenstad LM, Van Tasell DJ, Ewert C.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2003 Sep;14(7):347-60.

PMID:
14620609
7.
8.

Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.

Nelson DA, Van Tasell DJ, Schroder AC, Soli S, Levine S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Oct;98(4):1987-99.

PMID:
7593921
9.

Measurement of speech quality as a tool to optimize the fitting of a hearing aid.

Preminger JE, Van Tasell DJ.

J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Jun;38(3):726-36.

PMID:
7674663
10.

Quantifying the relation between speech quality and speech intelligibility.

Preminger JE, Van Tasell DJ.

J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Jun;38(3):714-25.

PMID:
7674662
11.

Effect of peak clipping on speech recognition threshold.

Crain TR, Van Tasell DJ.

Ear Hear. 1994 Dec;15(6):443-53.

PMID:
7895940
12.

Robust adaptive microphone array processing for hearing aids: realistic speech enhancement.

Hoffman MW, Trine TD, Buckley KM, Van Tasell DJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Aug;96(2 Pt 1):759-70.

PMID:
7930077
13.

Is useful speech information carried by fibers with high characteristic frequencies?

Strickland EA, Viemeister NF, Van Tasell DJ, Preminger JE.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jan;95(1):497-501.

PMID:
8120260
14.

Hearing loss, speech, and hearing aids.

Van Tasell DJ.

J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Apr;36(2):228-44. Review.

PMID:
8487516
15.

Temporal cues for consonant recognition: training, talker generalization, and use in evaluation of cochlear implants.

Van Tasell DJ, Greenfield DG, Logemann JJ, Nelson DA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Sep;92(3):1247-57.

PMID:
1401513
16.

Noise reduction hearing aids: release from masking and release from distortion.

Van Tasell DJ, Crain TR.

Ear Hear. 1992 Apr;13(2):114-21.

PMID:
1601192
17.

Maximum real-ear gain of in-the-ear hearing aids.

Erickson FN, Van Tasell DJ.

J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Apr;34(2):351-9.

PMID:
2046359
18.
19.

Effects of an adaptive filter hearing aid on speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired subjects.

van Tasell DJ, Larsen SY, Fabry DA.

Ear Hear. 1988 Feb;9(1):15-21.

PMID:
3342940
20.

Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.

Van Tasell DJ, Soli SD, Kirby VM, Widin GP.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Oct;82(4):1152-61.

PMID:
3680774

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center