Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 Aug;77(3):230-238. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117004049. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

The role of low-calorie sweeteners in the prevention and management of overweight and obesity: evidence v. conjecture.

Author information

Nutrition and Behaviour Unit,School of Experimental Psychology,University of Bristol,12a Priory Road,Bristol BS8 1TU,UK.


By virtue of reducing dietary energy density, low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) can be expected to decrease overall energy intake and thereby decrease body weight. Such effects will be limited by the amount of sugar replaced by LCS, and the dynamics of appetite and weight control (e.g., acute compensatory eating, and an increase in appetite and decrease in energy expenditure accompanying weight loss). Consistent with these predictions, short-term intervention studies show incomplete compensation for the consumption of LCS v. sugar, and longer-term intervention studies (from 4 weeks to 40 months duration) show small decreases in energy intake and body weight with LCS v. sugar. Despite this evidence, there are claims that LCS undermine weight management. Three claims are that: (1) LCS disrupt the learned control of energy intake (sweet taste confusion hypothesis); (2) exposure to sweetness increases desire for sweetness (sweet tooth hypothesis); (3) consumers might consciously overcompensate for 'calories saved' when they know they are consuming LCS (conscious overcompensation hypothesis). None of these claims stands up to close examination. In any case, the results of the intervention studies comparing LCS v. sugar indicate that the effect of energy dilution outweighs any tendency LCS might conceivably have to increase energy intake.


LCS low-calorie sweeteners; Appetite control; Low-calorie sweeteners; Overweight and obesity; Sugar


Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Cambridge University Press
Loading ...
Support Center