Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):669-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

Diagnostic interval and mortality in colorectal cancer: U-shaped association demonstrated for three different datasets.

Author information

1
The Research Unit for General Practice, The Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark. mlt@alm.au.dk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To test the theory of a U-shaped association between time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care to the diagnosis (the diagnostic interval) and mortality after diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING:

Three population-based studies in Denmark and the United Kingdom using data from general practitioner's questionnaires, interviewer-administered patient questionnaires, and primary care records, respectively.

RESULTS:

Despite variations in the potential selection and information bias when using different methods of identifying the date of first presentation, the association between the length of the diagnostic interval and 5-year mortality rate after the diagnosis of CRC was the same for all three types of data: displaying a U-shaped association with decreasing and subsequently increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals.

CONCLUSION:

Unknown confounding and in particular confounding by indication is likely to explain the counterintuitive findings of higher mortality among patients with very short diagnostic intervals, but cannot explain the increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals. The results support the theory that longer diagnostic intervals cause higher mortality in patients with CRC.

PMID:
22459430
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.006
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center