Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation:

HPB (Oxford). 2018 Sep;20(9):777-785. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.003.

A web-based overview, systematic review and meta-analysis of pancreatic anastomosis techniques following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Author information

1
Dept. of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
2
Dept. of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
3
Dept. of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
4
Dept. of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: I.Q.Molenaar@umcutrecht.nl.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Many pancreatic anastomoses have been proposed to reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy, but a complete overview is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide an online overview of all pancreatic anastomosis techniques and to evaluate the incidence of clinically relevant POPF in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS:

A literature search was performed to December 2017. Included were studies giving a detailed description of the pancreatic anastomosis after open pancreatoduodenectomy and RCTs comparing techniques for the incidence of POPF (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery [ISGPS] Grade B/C). Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS:

A total of 61 different anastomoses were found and summarized in 19 subgroups (www.pancreatic-anastomosis.com). In 6 RCTs, the POPF rate was 12% after pancreaticogastrostomy (n = 69/555) versus 20% after pancreaticojejunostomy (n = 106/531) (RR0.59; 95%CI 0.35-1.01, P = 0.05). Six RCTs comparing subtypes of pancreaticojejunostomy showed a pooled POPF rate of 10% (n = 109/1057). Duct-to-mucosa and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy showed similar results, respectively 14% (n = 39/278) versus 10% (n = 27/278) (RR1.40, 95%CI 0.47-4.15, P = 0.54).

CONCLUSION:

The proposed online overview can be used as an interactive platform, for uniformity in reporting anastomotic techniques and for educational purposes. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in POPF rate between pancreatic anastomosis techniques.

PMID:
29773356
DOI:
10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center