Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1172-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546516632507. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

No Difference on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patellofemoral Cartilage Composition Between Patients With Patellofemoral Pain and Healthy Controls.

Author information

1
Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
2
Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
3
Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
4
Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
5
Department of Sports Medicine, Medical Center Haaglanden, Leidschendam, the Netherlands.
6
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
7
Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
8
Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands m.vanmiddelkoop@erasmusmc.nl.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Retropatellar cartilage damage has been suggested as an etiological factor for patellofemoral pain (PFP), a common knee condition among young and physically active individuals. To date, there is no conclusive evidence for an association between cartilage defects and PFP. Nowadays, advanced quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques enable estimation of cartilage composition.

PURPOSE:

To investigate differences in patellofemoral cartilage composition between patients with PFP and healthy control subjects using quantitative MRI.

STUDY DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS:

Patients with PFP and healthy control subjects underwent 3.0-T MRI including delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage and T1ρ and T2 mapping. Differences in relaxation times of patellofemoral cartilage were compared between groups by linear regression analyses, adjusted for age, body mass index, sex, sports participation, and time of image acquisition.

RESULTS:

This case-control study included 64 patients and 70 controls. The mean (±SD) age was 23.2 ± 6.4 years and the mean body mass index was 22.9 ± 3.4 kg/m(2); 56.7% were female. For delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage, the mean T1GD relaxation times of patellar (657.8 vs 669.4 ms) and femoral cartilage (661.6 vs 659.8 ms) did not significantly differ between patients and controls. In addition, no significant difference was found in mean T1ρ relaxation times of patellar (46.9 vs 46.0 ms) and femoral cartilage (50.8 vs 50.2 ms) and mean T2 relaxation times of patellar (33.2 vs 32.9 ms) and femoral cartilage (36.7 vs 36.6 ms) between patients and controls. Analysis of prespecified medial and lateral subregions within the patellofemoral cartilage also revealed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION:

There was no difference in composition of the patellofemoral cartilage, estimated with multiple quantitative MRI techniques, between patients with PFP and healthy control subjects. However, clinically relevant differences could not be ruled out for T1ρ in the adolescent population. Retropatellar cartilage damage has long been hypothesized as an important factor in the pathogenesis of PFP, but study findings suggest that diminished patellofemoral cartilage composition is not associated with PFP.

KEYWORDS:

cartilage; knee; magnetic resonance imaging; patella; patellofemoral pain syndrome

PMID:
26951075
DOI:
10.1177/0363546516632507
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center