Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 1;8(3):e015902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015902.

Is healthy children surveillance being duplicated by family physicians and paediatricians? A cross-sectional study in Portugal.

Author information

1
Family Health Unit Ribeirão, Northern Regional Health Administration, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.
2
Family Health Unit Terras do Ave, Northern Regional Health Administration, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.
3
Personalized Health Care Unit Chaves A, Northern Regional Health Administration, Chaves, Portugal.
4
Family Health Unit Serzedelo, Family Health Unit Ribeirão, Guimarães, Portugal.
5
Western Oporto Public Health Unit, Northern Regional Health Administration, Porto, Portugal.
6
EPIUnit -The Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
#
Contributed equally

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To determine if children attend the family physician (FP) or the FP/paediatrician for their surveillance medical appointments, as well as analyse the variables associated with the parents' choice between the two physicians.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING:

Public, semiprivate and private kindergartens in the city of Vila Nova de Famalicão (Portugal).

PARTICIPANTS:

Parents of children aged 6 years or less without chronic diseases, enrolled in the selected kindergartens.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Proportion of children attending the FP or FP/paediatrician for their surveillance appointments; association between the chosen physician and sociodemographic and household variables (parents' age, educational level, professional situation and marital status; household net income; number of children; the child's age; presence of private health insurance), assessment of the parents' perception of clinical knowledge and accessibility regarding the FP and the paediatrician.

RESULTS:

A total of 697 children were included in the analysis: 30.6% attended only the FP and 69.4% attended both the FP and the paediatrician. Using a Poisson regression, the mother's age (PR=1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03), higher educational level (prevalence ratio (PR=1.15, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.33), private health insurance (PR=1.30, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.46), number of children (PR=0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.94) and the child's age (PR=0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98) were statistically associated with attending both the FP and the paediatrician; parents of children who attended only FP rated the FP with a higher accessibility and knowledge mean score than those who consulted both physicians (2.91vs2.38, P<0.001, and 4.11vs3.85, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our data show that 70% of our sample simultaneously attended an FP and a paediatrician. FPs are equally qualified to provide medical care to healthy children but this information is not properly transmitted to the general population.

KEYWORDS:

family physician; family practice.; infant; paediatric assistant; preschool child; primary health care

PMID:
29496894
PMCID:
PMC5855303
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015902
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center