Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Best matches for IPC–isoelectric point calculator:

Corrigendum. et al. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. (2017)

A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Low DA et al. Med Phys. (1998)

Automated calculation of point A coordinates for CT-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Kang H et al. J Contemp Brachytherapy. (2017)

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 188

  • The following term was not found in PubMed: IPC-isoelectric.
1.

A sensitivity analysis of pesticide concentrations in California Central Valley vernal pools.

Sinnathamby S, Minucci JM, Denton DL, Raimondo SM, Oliver L, Yuan Y, Young DF, Hook J, Pitchford AM, Waits E, Purucker ST.

Environ Pollut. 2019 Oct 30:113486. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113486. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31813706
2.

Clinical utility of 177 Lu-DOTATATE PRRT in somatostatin receptor-positive metastatic medullary carcinoma of thyroid patients with assessment of efficacy, survival analysis, prognostic variables, and toxicity.

Parghane RV, Naik C, Talole S, Desmukh A, Chaukar D, Banerjee S, Basu S.

Head Neck. 2019 Nov 22. doi: 10.1002/hed.26024. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31755622
3.

A laboratory-based scoring system predicts early treatment in Rai 0 chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Cohen JA, Rossi FM, Zucchetto A, Bomben R, Terzi-di-Bergamo L, Rabe KG, Degan M, Steffan A, Polesel J, Santinelli E, Innocenti I, Cutrona G, D' Arena G, Pozzato G, Zaja F, Chiarenza A, Rossi D, Di Raimondo F, Laurenti L, Gentile M, Morabito F, Neri A, Ferrarini M, Fegan CD, Pepper CJ, Del Poeta G, Parikh SA, Kay NE, Gattei V.

Haematologica. 2019 Oct 3. pii: haematol.2019.228171. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.228171. [Epub ahead of print]

4.

Standardization of Sequencing Coverage Depth in NGS: Recommendation for Detection of Clonal and Subclonal Mutations in Cancer Diagnostics.

Petrackova A, Vasinek M, Sedlarikova L, Dyskova T, Schneiderova P, Novosad T, Papajik T, Kriegova E.

Front Oncol. 2019 Sep 4;9:851. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00851. eCollection 2019.

5.

Patient satisfaction following thyroidectomy in surgical mission: a prospective study.

Gachabayov M, Latifi R.

Gland Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):385-388. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.06.06.

6.

Predicting complications following radical cystectomy with the ACS NSQIP universal surgical risk calculator.

Mannas MP, Lee T, Forbes CM, Hong T, Bisaillon A, Gleave ME, So AI, Mayson K, Black PC.

World J Urol. 2019 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02915-3. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31456016
7.

Early Prognostication after Traumatic Brain Injury: Specific Validation of the IMPACT Prognostic Calculator in a Level 1 Trauma Center.

Jung A, Arlt F, Rosolowski M, Meixensberger J.

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;80(6):423-429. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685137. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

PMID:
31430797
8.

Predicting skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: development of the SUNTRAC screening tool using data from a multicenter cohort study.

Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Crow LD, Lowenstein S, Garrett GL, Melcher ML, Chan AW, Boscardin J, Arron ST.

Transpl Int. 2019 Dec;32(12):1259-1267. doi: 10.1111/tri.13493. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

PMID:
31423648
9.

Externally Validated Score to Predict Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction With Cervi Ripening.

Jochum F, Le Ray C, Blanc-Petitjean P, Langer B, Meyer N, Severac F, Sananes N.

Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;134(3):502-510. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003405.

PMID:
31403585
10.

Can We Predict Incisional Hernia?: Development of a Surgery-specific Decision-Support Interface.

Basta MN, Kozak GM, Broach RB, Messa CA 4th, Rhemtulla I, DeMatteo RP, Serletti JM, Fischer JP.

Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):544-553. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003472.

PMID:
31318790
11.

Validation and Normative Data for the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status: The Sydney Memory and Ageing Study.

Bentvelzen AC, Crawford JD, Theobald A, Maston K, Slavin MJ, Reppermund S, Kang K, Numbers K, Brodaty H, Sachdev P, Kochan NA.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2108-2115. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16033. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

PMID:
31290146
12.

Improved quantification of muscle insulin sensitivity using oral glucose tolerance test data: the MISI Calculator.

O'Donovan SD, Lenz M, Goossens GH, van der Kallen CJH, Eussen SJMP, Stehouwer CDA, van Greevenbroek MM, Schram MT, Sep SJ, Peeters RLM, Blaak EE, van Riel NAW, de Kok TMCM, Arts ICW.

Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 28;9(1):9388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45858-w.

13.

Machine Learning Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Feeny AK, Rickard J, Patel D, Toro S, Trulock KM, Park CJ, LaBarbera MA, Varma N, Niebauer MJ, Sinha S, Gorodeski EZ, Grimm RA, Ji X, Barnard J, Madabhushi A, Spragg DD, Chung MK.

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;12(7):e007316. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007316. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

PMID:
31216884
14.

Examining the Impact of the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Risk Calculator Estimation on Trial of Labor After Cesarean Counseling.

Jeffries E, Falcone-Wharton A, Daggy J, Tucker Edmonds B.

MDM Policy Pract. 2019 May 27;4(1):2381468319850830. doi: 10.1177/2381468319850830. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.

15.

Write a Scientific Paper (WASP): Coda, but our revels now are not ended.

Grech V.

Early Hum Dev. 2019 Jul;134:50. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 24.

PMID:
31133350
16.

A Modular Safety System for an Insulin Dose Recommender: A Feasibility Study.

Liu C, Avari P, Leal Y, Wos M, Sivasithamparam K, Georgiou P, Reddy M, Fernández-Real JM, Martin C, Fernández-Balsells M, Oliver N, Herrero P.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May 22:1932296819851135. doi: 10.1177/1932296819851135. [Epub ahead of print]

17.

Using Artificial Intelligence to Revise ACR TI-RADS Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Diagnostic Accuracy and Utility.

Wildman-Tobriner B, Buda M, Hoang JK, Middleton WD, Thayer D, Short RG, Tessler FN, Mazurowski MA.

Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):112-119. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182128. Epub 2019 May 21.

PMID:
31112088
18.

Novel calculator for estimation of Freundlich partitioning coefficient.

Eckel WP.

Chemosphere. 2019 Sep;230:308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 May 9.

PMID:
31108442
19.

Software Application Profile: The Anchored Multiplier calculator-a Bayesian tool to synthesize population size estimates.

Wesson PD, McFarland W, Qin CC, Mirzazadeh A.

Int J Epidemiol. 2019 May 18. pii: dyz101. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz101. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31106350
20.

Diagnostic Value of Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratio in Prostate Cancer.

Adhyatma KP, Warli SM.

Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Apr 13;7(7):1093-1096. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.252. eCollection 2019 Apr 15.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center