Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

Front Neurosci. 2015 Jul 29;9:254. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00254. eCollection 2015.

Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo Oslo, Norway ; The Mind Research Network Albuquerque, NM, USA.
2
The Mind Research Network Albuquerque, NM, USA.
3
The Mind Research Network Albuquerque, NM, USA ; Department of Computer Science, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA ; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Abstract

Multi-subject or group-level component analysis provides a data-driven approach to study properties of brain networks. Algorithms for group-level data decomposition of functional magnetic resonance imaging data have been brought forward more than a decade ago and have significantly matured since. Similar applications for electroencephalographic data are at a comparatively early stage of development though, and their sensitivity to topographic variability of the electroencephalogram or loose time-locking of neuronal responses has not yet been assessed. This study investigates the performance of independent component analysis (ICA) and second order blind source identification (SOBI) for data decomposition, and their combination with either temporal or spatial concatenation of data sets, for multi-subject analyses of electroencephalographic data. Analyses of simulated sources with different spatial, frequency, and time-locking profiles, revealed that temporal concatenation of data sets with either ICA or SOBI served well to reconstruct sources with both strict and loose time-locking, whereas performance decreased in the presence of topographical variability. The opposite pattern was found with a spatial concatenation of subject-specific data sets. This study proofs that procedures for group-level decomposition of electroencephalographic data can be considered valid and promising approaches to infer the latent structure of multi-subject data sets. Yet, specific implementations need further adaptations to optimally address sources of inter-subject and inter-trial variance commonly found in EEG recordings.

KEYWORDS:

EEG; ICA; SOBI; blind source separation; group component analysis; multisubject analysis

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center