Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

Br J Cancer. 2017 Sep 5;117(6):888-897. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.236. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Evidence of advanced stage colorectal cancer with longer diagnostic intervals: a pooled analysis of seven primary care cohorts comprising 11720 patients in five countries.

Author information

1
Department of Anthropology, School of Culture and Society, Aarhus University, Moesgaard Allé 20, Højbjerg DK-8270, Denmark.
2
Division of Applied Health Sciences, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
3
University of Exeter, College House, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter EX1 2 LU, UK.
4
Research Unit for General Practice, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 20, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.
5
Primary Care Research Unit, Primary Care Majorca Department, Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Reina Esclaramunda 9, Palma Mallorca 07003, Spain.
6
Department of Organ and Plastic Surgery, Breast Centre, Vejle Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, Vejle DK-7100, Denmark.
7
Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1265 Welch Road, MSOB #X214, Stanford, California CA 94305, USA.
8
School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Queen's Campus, University Boulevard, Stockton on Tees, England TS17 6BH, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The benefits from expedited diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are uncertain. We aimed to analyse the relationship between stage of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the primary and specialist care components of the diagnostic interval.

METHODS:

We identified seven independent data sets from population-based studies in Scotland, England, Canada, Denmark and Spain during 1997-2010 with a total of 11720 newly diagnosed CRC patients, who had initially presented with symptoms to a primary care physician. Data were extracted from patient records, registries, audits and questionnaires, respectively. Data sets were required to hold information on dates in the diagnostic interval (defined as the time from the first presentation of symptoms in primary care until the date of diagnosis), symptoms at first presentation in primary care, route of referral, gender, age and histologically confirmed stage. We carried out reanalysis of all individual data sets and, using the same method, analysed a pooled individual patient data set.

RESULTS:

The association between intervals and stage was similar in the individual and combined data set. There was a statistically significant convex (∩-shaped) association between primary care interval and diagnosis of advanced (i.e., distant or regional) rather than localised CRC (P=0.004), with odds beginning to increase from the first day on and peaking at 90 days. For specialist care, we saw an opposite and statistically significant concave (∪-shaped) association, with a trough at 60 days, between the interval and diagnosis of advanced CRC (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provides evidence that longer diagnostic intervals are associated with more advanced CRC. Furthermore, the study cannot define a specific 'safe' waiting time as the length of the primary care interval appears to have negative impact from day one.

PMID:
28787432
PMCID:
PMC5589987
DOI:
10.1038/bjc.2017.236
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center