Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

BMC Med. 2018 Jul 18;16(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1098-3.

Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of vaccination against human papillomavirus in males: a systematic review.

Author information

1
Robert Koch Institute, Immunization Unit, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany. hardert@rki.de.
2
Robert Koch Institute, Immunization Unit, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
3
Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University Munich, Chair of Epidemiology, Munich, Germany.
4
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is safe and effective in preventing cervical cancer in females. As HPV infections can also induce cancers of the anus, penis and oral cavity, male vaccination is also advocated, but systematic reviews on efficacy and safety in males are lacking.

METHODS:

We performed a systematic review on the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of HPV vaccination in males of any age. MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to April 2017.

RESULTS:

We identified 5196 articles and seven studies (four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three non-randomized studies) were included, comprising a total of 5294 participants. Vaccine efficacy against at least 6-month persisting anogenital HPV 16 infections was 46.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 28.6-60.8%), whereas efficacy against persisting oral infections was 88% (2-98%). A vaccine efficacy of 61.9% (21.4-82.8%) and 46.8% (- 20 to -77.9%) was observed against anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and grade 3 lesions, respectively. No meaningful estimates were available on vaccine efficacy or effectiveness against penile intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3, and no data were identified for anal, penile or head and neck squamous cell cancer. In participants who were HPV-seronegative and PCR-negative at enrolment, efficacy against all outcomes was higher as compared to seropositive and/or PCR-positive individuals. Risk of bias was low in three RCTs and high in one, while the three non-randomized studies were at serious to critical risk of bias. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation evidence quality was moderate to low for most outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

HPV vaccination in males is moderately effective against persistent anogenital HPV infection and high-grade anal intraepithelial lesions in studies where the population consists mainly of HPV-infected males. Vaccine effectiveness was high in study groups comprising HPV-naïve males. This supports a recommendation for vaccination of boys before the onset of sexual activity with the goal of establishing optimal vaccine-induced protection. Mathematical modelling studies will still be needed to assess the effects of adding males to existing HPV vaccination programs in females.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration CRD42016038965 .

KEYWORDS:

Effectiveness; Efficacy; Human papillomavirus; Safety; Systematic review

PMID:
30016957
PMCID:
PMC6050686
DOI:
10.1186/s12916-018-1098-3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center