Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

J Clin Densitom. 2017 Apr - Jun;20(2):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

Densitometer-Specific Differences in the Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
2
CaMos National Coordinating Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
3
Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
4
Centre of Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
5
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
6
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
7
Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
8
Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
9
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
10
Saskatoon Osteoporosis and CaMos Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
11
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
12
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
13
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; CaMos National Coordinating Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
14
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: suzanne.morin@mcgill.ca.

Abstract

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a gray-level texture measure derived from lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images that predicts fractures independent of bone mineral density (BMD). Increased abdominal soft tissue in individuals with elevated body mass index (BMI) absorbs more X-rays during image acquisition for BMD measurement and must be accommodated by the TBS algorithm. We aimed to determine if the relationship between BMI and TBS varied between 2 major manufacturers' densitometers, because different densitometers accommodate soft tissues differently. We identified 1919 women and 811 men, participants of the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, aged ≥40 yr with lumbar spine DXA scans acquired on GE Lunar (4 centers) or Hologic (3 centers) densitometers at year 10 of follow-up. TBS was calculated for L1-L4 (TBS iNsight® software, version 2.1). A significant negative correlation between TBS and BMI was observed when TBS measurements were performed on Hologic densitometers in men (Pearson r = -0.36, p <0.0001) and in women (Pearson r = -0.33, p <0.0001); significant correlations were not seen when TBS was measured on GE Lunar densitometers (Pearson r = 0.00 in men, Pearson r = -0.02 in women). Age-adjusted linear regression models confirmed significant interactions between BMI and densitometer manufacturer for both men and women (p < 0.0001). In contrast, comparable positive correlations were observed between BMD and BMI on both Hologic and GE Lunar densitometers in men and women. In conclusion, BMI significantly affects TBS values in men and women when measured on Hologic but not GE Lunar densitometers. This finding has implications for clinical and research applications of TBS, especially when TBS is measured sequentially on DXA densitometers from different manufacturers or when results from different machines are pooled for analysis.

KEYWORDS:

Body mass index; bone mineral density; cohort study; densitometer; trabecular bone score

PMID:
28034592
DOI:
10.1016/j.jocd.2016.11.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center