Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Dan Med J. 2014 Jun;61(6):A4855.

Current organisation of follow-up does not meet cancer patients' needs.

Author information

1
Quality & Patient Safety, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. sperling@cancer.dk.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

For cancer patients, traditional follow-up care is considered unsuitable and unsustainable. The patient perspective seems often to be absent in the ongoing debate about alternative strategies for follow-up care. Based on a national survey from 2012, the objective of this study was to examine cancer patients' support needs regarding physiological and emotional problems during follow-up and to identify factors associated with their needs and any unmet needs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Patients diagnosed with cancer in the period from April to September 2010 were invited to participate. A total of 4,401 patients responded (response rate = 64%). The risks in terms of prevalence rate ratios of having needs and unmet needs for both physiological and emotional problems were estimated using the Poisson regression.

RESULTS:

The study showed that 60% of the patients had needs for support regarding physiological and emotional problems, and half of the patients reported unmet needs. Younger patients and patients with co-morbidity were more likely to report needs and unmet needs for physiological and emotional support. Treatment complexity and setting of follow-up were not associated with unmet needs.

CONCLUSION:

The study underlines that the current organisation of follow-up does not meet cancer patients' needs. Several factors are associated with both needs and unmet needs. Hence, a more sustainable approach for follow-up care may consist in stratification tailored to the patients' different needs. In such an approach, more focus should be on age-specific needs and the impact of co-morbidity.

FUNDING:

The study is funded by the Danish Cancer Society.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (J. no. 2010-41-4694). According to the Danish Act on Research Ethics Review of Health Research Projects (S. 8(3) of Act No. 402 of 28 May 2003), no ethical approval was needed.

PMID:
24947626
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center