Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208449. eCollection 2018.

Can patients be trained to expect shared decision making in clinical consultations? Feasibility study of a public library program to raise patient awareness.

Author information

1
Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec City (QC, Canada).
2
Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSPUL), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City (QC, Canada).
3
Freelance science communication specialist, Quebec City (QC, Canada).
4
Bibliothèque de Québec (Quebec City network of public libraries), Quebec City (QC, Canada).
5
Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City (QC, Canada).
6
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City (QC, Canada).
7
Centre intégré de santé et services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (site Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis), Lévis (QC, Canada).
8
Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Hôpital St-François D'Assise, Quebec city (QC, Canada).
9
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Quebec City (QC, Canada).
10
Quebec SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Quebec City (QC, Canada).

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Shared decision making (SDM) is a process whereby decisions are made together by patients and/or families and clinicians. Nevertheless, few patients are aware of its proven benefits. This study investigated the feasibility, acceptability and impact of an intervention to raise public awareness of SDM in public libraries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A 1.5 hour interactive workshop to be presented in public libraries was co-designed with Quebec City public library network officials, a science communication specialist and physicians. A clinical topic of maximum reach was chosen: antibiotic overuse in treatment of acute respiratory tract infections. The workshop content was designed and a format, whereby a physician presents the information and the science communication specialist invites questions and participation, was devised. The event was advertised to the general public. An evaluation form was used to collect data on participants' sociodemographics, feasibility and acceptability components and assess a potential impact of the intervention. Facilitators held a post-workshop focus group to qualitatively assess feasibility, acceptability and impact.

RESULTS:

All 10 planned workshops were held. Out of 106 eligible public participants, 89 were included in the analysis. Most participants were women (77.6%), retired (46.1%) and over 45 (59.5%). Over 90% of participants considered the workshop content to be relevant, accessible, and clear. They reported substantial average knowledge gain about antibiotics (2.4, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.0-2.8; P < .001) and about SDM (4.0, 95% CI: 3.4-4.5; P < .001). Self-reported knowledge gain about SDM was significantly higher than about antibiotics (4.0 versus 2.4; P < .001). Knowledge gain did not vary by sociodemographic characteristics. The focus group confirmed feasibility and suggested improvements.

CONCLUSIONS:

A public library intervention is feasible and effective way to increase public awareness of SDM and could be a new approach to implementing SDM by preparing potential patients to ask for it in the consulting room.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center