Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

BMJ. 2018 May 22;361:k1920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1920.

Atraumatic (pencil-point) versus conventional needles for lumbar puncture: a clinical practice guideline.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
2
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
3
Division of Neurosurgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
4
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
5
Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
6
Department of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust-division, Gjøvik, Norway.
7
Division General Internal Medicine & Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
8
Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine & Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada.
9
Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, Lévis, Canada.
10
CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada.
11
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
12
Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
13
Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Emergency and Critical Care, Rikshospitalet Medical Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
14
Department of Pediatrics, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
15
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
16
The BMJ (Research and Evaluation), London, UK.
17
Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
18
McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
19
Virginia, USA.
20
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
21
Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec City, Canada.
22
Department of Family and Emergency Medicine & Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care & Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Laval, Canada.
23
Department of Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
24
Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
25
Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
26
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada francois.lamontagne@usherbrooke.ca.
PMID:
29789372
PMCID:
PMC6364256
DOI:
10.1136/bmj.k1920
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the BMJ Rapid Recommendations interests disclosure form, and a detailed description of all disclosures is reported in appendix 2 on bmj.com. As with all BMJ Rapid Recommendations, the executive team and The BMJ judged that no panel member had any financial conflict of interest. Professional and academic interests are minimised as much as possible, while maintaining necessary expertise on the panel to make fully informed decisions. Three authors of the systematic review were on the guideline panel (WA, SAA, JB).

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center