Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found using an alternative search:

Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):704-16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3481-4. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer.

Author information

1
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Controversy exists regarding the optimal margin width in breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer.

METHODS:

A multidisciplinary consensus panel used a meta-analysis of margin width and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) from a systematic review of 33 studies including 28,162 patients as the primary evidence base for consensus.

RESULTS:

Positive margins (ink on invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ) are associated with a two-fold increase in the risk of IBTR compared with negative margins. This increased risk is not mitigated by favorable biology, endocrine therapy, or a radiation boost. More widely clear margins than no ink on tumor do not significantly decrease the rate of IBTR compared with no ink on tumor. There is no evidence that more widely clear margins reduce IBTR for young patients or for those with unfavorable biology, lobular cancers, or cancers with an extensive intraductal component.

CONCLUSION:

The use of no ink on tumor as the standard for an adequate margin in invasive cancer in the era of multidisciplinary therapy is associated with low rates of IBTR and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcomes, and decrease health care costs.

PMID:
24515565
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-014-3481-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center