Format

Send to

Choose Destination

See 1 citation found by title matching your search:

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;73(12):1565-1577. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2335-y. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Analysis of integrated clinical trial protocols in early phases of medicinal product development.

Author information

1
Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
2
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Germany. thomas.sudhop@bfarm.de.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

While in the past, most clinical trial applications (CTAs) following non-integrated (standard) protocols were used to investigate one primary objective concerning a (new) drug, nowadays, the use of integrated protocols investigating multiple objectives within the same CTA becomes more and more popular. The aims of the present study were to investigate the usage and the impact of integrated protocols on regulatory activities and to find the motivation for their increasing use.

METHODS:

Two thousand nine hundred sixty-nine phase I and I/II CTAs submitted to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) during the time period from August 1, 2004, until August 31, 2014, were analysed with regard to protocol and sponsor status, duration until initial authorisation and the number of substantial amendments and their respective approval times. Additionally, applicants who submitted integrated protocols to BfArM were interviewed with respect to their opinion on integrated protocols in an online survey.

RESULTS:

The percentage of integrated protocols has constantly increased by approximately 10% within the last 10 years from 17.9% in 2004 to 28.2% in 2014. It could be shown that authorisation procedures with single integrated protocols take significantly longer until initial authorisation (58 vs. 53 days) requires more substantial amendments (1.9 vs. 1.2 amendments per CTA) and the approval of the entirety of amendments takes longer to process as compared to standard protocols (22 vs. 14 days). Nevertheless, applicants prefer the use of integrated protocols due to higher time and cost economy for the entire phase I development process.

CONCLUSION:

Although clinical trials (CTs) following integrated protocols are partly more time-consuming and costly, still, time and/or money may be saved during drug development due to the fact that overall, fewer CTs are needed than with standard protocols. Hence, the main reason for the increasing use of integrated protocols is improved time and cost efficiencies when conducting CTs.

KEYWORDS:

Early-phase clinical trials; Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM); Integrated protocol; Non-integrated (standard) protocol; Substantial amendment

PMID:
28921395
PMCID:
PMC5684304
DOI:
10.1007/s00228-017-2335-y
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center