A socio-technical systems approach to studying interruptions: understanding the interrupter's perspective

Appl Ergon. 2014 May;45(3):747-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Oct 6.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand the cognitive processes underlying nurses' decision to interrupt other nurses. The Institute of Medicine (2000) reported that interruptions are likely contributors to medical errors. Unfortunately, the research to date has been quite homogenous, focusing only on the healthcare provider being interrupted, ignoring the true complexities of interruptions. This study took a socio-technical approach being the first to examine interruptions from the viewpoint of the interrupting nurse. Over 15 h of observations and 10 open-ended interviews with expert nurses in a Neuroscience Surgical Intensive Care Unit were conducted. It was found that nurses conduct a quick cost-benefit assessment to determine the interruptibility of other nurses and whether an interruption is value-added vs. non-value added. To complete the assessment, nurses consider several conditional factors related to the interruptee, the interrupter, and the nature of the interruption content, and different potential consequences of the interruption.

Keywords: Healthcare; Interruptions; Socio-technical systems.

MeSH terms

  • Attention
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Critical Care Nursing / economics
  • Critical Care Nursing / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Medical Errors / psychology
  • Neurosurgery / economics
  • Neurosurgery / nursing
  • Nurses / economics
  • Nurses / psychology
  • Task Performance and Analysis*
  • Work / economics
  • Work / psychology*