A Simulation-Based Quality Improvement Initiative Improves Pediatric Readiness in Community Hospitals

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Jun;34(6):431-435. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001233.

Abstract

Background: The National Pediatric Readiness Project Pediatric Readiness Survey (PRS) measured pediatric readiness in 4149 US emergency departments (EDs) and noted an average score of 69 on a 100-point scale. This readiness score consists of 6 domains: coordination of pediatric patient care (19/100), physician/nurse staffing and training (10/100), quality improvement activities (7/100), patient safety initiatives (14/100), policies and procedures (17/100), and availability of pediatric equipment (33/100). We aimed to assess and improve pediatric emergency readiness scores across Connecticut's hospitals.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the National Pediatric Readiness Project readiness score before and after an in situ simulation-based assessment and quality improvement program in Connecticut hospitals.

Methods: We leveraged in situ simulations to measure the quality of resuscitative care provided by interprofessional teams to 3 simulated patients (infant septic shock, infant seizure, and child cardiac arrest) presenting to their ED resuscitation bay. Assessments of EDs were made based on a composite quality score that was measured as the sum of 4 distinct domains: (1) adherence to sepsis guidelines, (2) adherence to cardiac arrest guidelines, (3) performance on seizure resuscitation, and (4) teamwork. After the simulation, a detailed report with scores, comparisons to other EDs, and a gap analysis were provided to sites. Based on this report, a regional children's hospital team worked collaboratively with each ED to develop action items and a timeline for improvements. The National Pediatric Readiness Project PRS scores, the primary outcome of this study, were measured before and after participation.

Results: Twelve community EDs in Connecticut participated in this project. The PRS scores were assessed before and after the intervention (simulation-based assessment and gap analysis/report-out). The average time between PRS assessments was 21 months. The PRS scores significantly improved 12.9% from the first assessment (mean ± SEM = 64 ± 4.4) to the second assessment (77 ± 4.0, P = 0.022). The PRS score domains also showed improvements in coordination of pediatric patient care (median improvement, 50%), quality improvement activities (median improvement, 79%), patient safety initiatives (mean improvement, 7%), policies and procedures (mean improvement, 17%), and availability of pediatric equipment (mean improvement, 7%).

Conclusions: Participation in a simulation-based quality improvement collaborative was associated with improvements in pediatric readiness.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cohort Studies
  • Connecticut
  • Emergency Service, Hospital / standards*
  • Hospitals, Community / standards*
  • Hospitals, Pediatric / standards*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Patient Simulation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care / standards*
  • Quality Improvement*
  • Resuscitation / standards