Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0215645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215645. eCollection 2019.

Are we restoring functional fens? - The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits.

Author information

1
Department of Plant Ecology & Environmental Conservation, Institute of Botany, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
2
Ecosystem Management Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
3
The Community and Conservation Ecology Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
4
Staatliche Vogelschutzwarte-Naturschutzstation Dümmer-Niedersächsischer Landesbetrieb für Wasserwirtschaft, Küsten- und Naturschutz Am Ochsenmoor, Ochsenmoor, Germany.
5
Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
6
BMS-Umweltplanung, Osnabrück, Germany in association with University of Bremen, Germany.
7
Natura 2000 Team, Regierung von Oberbayern, München, Germany.
8
Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
9
It Fryske Gea (Frysian Landscape), Olterterp, the Nederlands.
10
Zuid-Hollands Landschap, Delft, the Netherlands.
11
Department of Ecology and Ecosystem management, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
12
Zentrum für Umwelt und Kultur Benediktbeuern (ZUK), Gebietsbetreuerin Isar-Loisach-Moore, Benediktbeuern, Germany.
13
Institute for Ecosystem Research, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
14
Klub Przyrodników, Świebodzin, Poland.
15
Landscape Ecology and Ecosystem Dynamics, Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
16
Department of Botany, Institute of Botany and Nature Conservation, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland.
17
Coöperatie Bosgroep Zuid Nederland, Heeze & Floristische Werkgroep KNNV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
18
Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
19
B-WARE B.V. Research Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
20
Province Zuid-Holland, The Hague, the Netherlands.
21
Landschap Overijssel, Dalfsen, the Netherlands.
22
BNL-Vegelin, Murchin, Germany.

Abstract

In peatland restoration we often lack an information whether re-established ecosystems are functionally similar to non-degraded ones. We re-analysed the long-term outcomes of restoration on vegetation and plant functional traits in 38 European fens restored by rewetting (18 sites) and topsoil removal (20 sites). We used traits related to nutrient acquisition strategies, competitiveness, seed traits, and used single- and multi-trait metrics. A separate set of vegetation records from near-natural fens with diverse plant communities was used to generate reference values to aid the comparisons. We found that both restoration methods enhanced the similarity of species composition to non-degraded systems but trait analysis revealed differences between the two approaches. Traits linked to nutrient acquisition strategies indicated that topsoil removal was more effective than rewetting. After topsoil removal competitive species in plant communities had decreased, while stress-tolerant species had increased. A substantial reduction in nutrient availability ruled out the effect of initial disturbance. An ability to survive and grow in anoxic conditions was enhanced after restoration, but the reference values were not achieved. Rewetting was more effective than topsoil removal in restricting variation in traits values permitted in re-developing vegetation. We found no indication of a shift towards reference in seed traits, which suggested that dispersal constraint and colonization deficit can be a widespread phenomena. Two functional diversity indices: functional richness and functional dispersion showed response to restoration and shifted values towards reference mires and away from the degraded systems. We concluded that targeting only one type of environmental stressor does not lead to a recovery of fens, as it provides insufficient level of stress to restore a functional ecosystem. In general, restoration efforts do not ensure the re-establishment and long-term persistence of fens. Restoration efforts result in recovery of fen ecosystems, confirmed with our functional trait analysis, although more rigid actions are needed for restoring fully functional mires, by achieving high and constant levels of anoxia and nutrient stresses.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center