Introduction: Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) made possible the treatment of aortic disease that previously could only be approached openly, associated with a considerable morbidity and mortality. However, it also brings new challenges influencing patient selection - favourable landing zone, good peripheral access, propensity for endoleak (EL) - that requires rigorous clinical and imaging follow- -up.
Objective: Review all patients that underwent TEVAR in our Department and assess morbidity and mortality.
Methods: From November 2007 to September 2017, 57 TEVAR were performed in our Department to 52 patients. All patients performed postoperative CT angiography within 30 days after surgery. Follow-up was carried in our Outpatient Clinic with annual imaging. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSSTM 22 (© IBM).
Results: Patients' mean age was 65.6 ± 10.3 years and 69.2% were male (n = 36). Mean follow-up was 48.1 ± 34.1 months. The most frequent surgical indication was thoracic aortic aneurysm (42.1%), followed by chronic type B aortic dissection (35.1%), pseudoaneurysm (10.5%), reintervention by EL (7.0%), penetrating aortic ulcer (3.5%) and traumatic dissection of the aorta (1.8%). Surgery was elective in 87.7% of cases and part of a dual stage strategy in 17.3%. In-hospital mortality was 3.9%. Survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 87.9%, 85.6% and 71.5%, respectively. Reported complications were: need for endovascular reintervention 7.7%; complication of femoral access 7.7%; and cerebellar infarction 1.9%. Throughout follow-up, no EL was detected in 56.1% of patients. There was an incidence of early EL in 38.4%, of which 45.0% had spontaneous resolution, documented in subsequent CT scans. The most frequent was type IA (42.9%) that was also the one with the highest spontaneous resolution rate (62.5%). Mean time to diagnosis of late EL was 36.9 ± 21.4 months and occurred in 11.5% of patients, the most frequent being type IA (50.0%); there was no spontaneous resolution observed. In all cases of reintervention due to EL a good surgical result was obtained.
Conclusion: TEVAR is a procedure with low morbidity and mortality, good long-term outcome and a relatively low incidence of EL. Most patients do not have EL during their follow-up and have an excellent survival. The most frequent early EL is type IA and about half resolve in the following months. Although rare, late EL did not present spontaneous resolution. The treatment of EL can easily be achieved with new intervention and excellent result.