Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Environ Manage. 2018 May 1;213:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.077. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Rice-duck co-culture for reducing negative impacts of biogas slurry application in rice production systems.

Author information

1
College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, PR China. Electronic address: yanghaishui@njau.edu.cn.
2
College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, PR China. Electronic address: yudgu@njau.edu.cn.
3
College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, PR China. Electronic address: 2016101010@njau.edu.cn.
4
College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, PR China. Electronic address: 2013010101@njau.edu.cn.
5
College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, PR China. Electronic address: bjxlml@163.com.
6
Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7043, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: martin.weih@slu.se.

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) losses are a potential limitation for the direct application of biogas slurry as a substitute for chemical fertilizer in irrigated rice production systems. The hypothesis was tested that a rice-duck co-culture promotes the rice N and P use efficiencies, reducing the losses of these nutrient elements through run-offs and enabling the use of biogas slurry as a substitute for chemical fertilizers. A field split-plot experiment was carried out to test the hypothesis. Our results showed that the direct application of biogas slurry was harmful for rice production. Compared with rice monoculture under chemical fertilization, biogas slurry application reduced N and P accumulation in grains, P use efficiency, and grain yield by 3.6%, 7.8%, 12.7%, and 14.8%, respectively, but increased the total N and P concentrations in the surface water 1.4- and 2.7-fold, respectively, on average on the eleventh day after fertilization. However, rice-duck co-culture compensated for the negative effects of biogas slurry on rice production. Under the biogas slurry application and in line with our hypothesis, the rice-duck co-culture significantly increased N and P accumulation and use efficiencies, as well as grain yield to levels similar to those acquired with chemical fertilization treatments. Meanwhile, total N and P concentrations were significantly lower for rice-duck co-culture than those of rice monoculture under biogas slurry application. Our results suggest that rice-duck co-culture can maintain rice yield and reduce the risks of N and P loss to local environments when utilizing biogas slurry as a substitute for chemical fertilizers.

KEYWORDS:

Agroecosystem; Ecological recycling agriculture; Fertilizer; Irrigated rice production; Nutrient loss

PMID:
29494930
DOI:
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.077
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center