Format

Send to

Choose Destination
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2545-2555. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607033.

A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Antibiotics for Smaller Skin Abscesses.

Author information

1
From the University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago (R.S.D., N.K.); Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and Los Angeles BioMedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles (L.G.M., S.J.E.), and University of California, San Francisco-San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco (D.Y., M.D., H.F.C.); Morehouse School of Medicine and Emory University-Grady Memorial Hospital and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta (L.I., T.C.P.); Washington University School of Medicine-Barnes-Jewish Hospital and St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis (S.F., M.G.B.); Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (C.B.C.); EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD (S.P.); and Cota Enterprises, Meriden, KS (R.H.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Uncomplicated skin abscesses are common, yet the appropriate management of the condition in the era of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is unclear.

METHODS:

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, double-blind trial involving outpatient adults and children. Patients were stratified according to the presence of a surgically drainable abscess, abscess size, the number of sites of skin infection, and the presence of nonpurulent cellulitis. Participants with a skin abscess 5 cm or smaller in diameter were enrolled. After abscess incision and drainage, participants were randomly assigned to receive clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), or placebo for 10 days. The primary outcome was clinical cure 7 to 10 days after the end of treatment.

RESULTS:

We enrolled 786 participants: 505 (64.2%) were adults and 281 (35.8%) were children. A total of 448 (57.0%) of the participants were male. S. aureus was isolated from 527 participants (67.0%), and MRSA was isolated from 388 (49.4%). Ten days after therapy in the intention-to-treat population, the cure rate among participants in the clindamycin group was similar to that in the TMP-SMX group (221 of 266 participants [83.1%] and 215 of 263 participants [81.7%], respectively; P=0.73), and the cure rate in each active-treatment group was higher than that in the placebo group (177 of 257 participants [68.9%], P<0.001 for both comparisons). The results in the population of patients who could be evaluated were similar. This beneficial effect was restricted to participants with S. aureus infection. Among the participants who were initially cured, new infections at 1 month of follow-up were less common in the clindamycin group (15 of 221, 6.8%) than in the TMP-SMX group (29 of 215 [13.5%], P=0.03) or the placebo group (22 of 177 [12.4%], P=0.06). Adverse events were more frequent with clindamycin (58 of 265 [21.9%]) than with TMP-SMX (29 of 261 [11.1%]) or placebo (32 of 255 [12.5%]); all adverse events resolved without sequelae. One participant who received TMP-SMX had a hypersensitivity reaction.

CONCLUSIONS:

As compared with incision and drainage alone, clindamycin or TMP-SMX in conjunction with incision and drainage improves short-term outcomes in patients who have a simple abscess. This benefit must be weighed against the known side-effect profile of these antimicrobials. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00730028 .).

PMID:
28657870
DOI:
10.1056/NEJMoa1607033
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center