Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec 20;22(6):354-358. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00179. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

Clinical Evaluation and Outcomes of Digital Chest Drainage after Lung Resection.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Analog chest drainage systems (ACS) are generally used to monitor postoperative alveolar air leakage (PAL) after lung resection. An electronic digital chest drainage system (DCS) has recently been developed that reportedly has several advantages over the traditional ACS. Here, we report a single institution's experience of PAL management with the DCS. We also sought to establish whether DCS had superior clinical benefits and outcomes compared with ACS.

METHODS:

We enrolled 112 consecutive patients who underwent lung resection and were subsequently managed with DCS. We compared PAL rate, duration of chest drainage, and the incidence of complications with a group of 121 consecutive patients previously managed with ACS after lung resection, using propensity score matching.

RESULTS:

Mean maximum and minimum PAL rates during DCS chest drainage were 48.9 ml/min (range: 2.0-868.6 ml/min) and 0.1 ml/min (0.0-1.2 ml/min), respectively. Mean PAL rate at DCS removal was 1.3 ml/min (0.0-10.0 ml/min). After propensity score matching, mean duration of chest drainage was significantly shorter with DCS than ACS (2.7 days, range: 1-9 days, compared with 3.7 days, range: 1-21 days, respectively; P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS:

Managing PAL with DCS after pulmonary resection appears to reduce the duration of chest drainage.

PMID:
27885215
PMCID:
PMC5183980
DOI:
10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00179
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for J-STAGE, Japan Science and Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center