Format

Send to

Choose Destination
RNA. 2017 Feb;23(2):169-174. doi: 10.1261/rna.058784.116. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

Comparison of SHAPE reagents for mapping RNA structures inside living cells.

Author information

1
Center for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
2
Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

Abstract

Recent advances in SHAPE technology have converted the classic primer extension method to next-generation sequencing platforms, allowing transcriptome-level analysis of RNA secondary structure. In particular, icSHAPE and SHAPE-MaP, using NAI-N3 and 1M7 reagents, respectively, are methods that claim to measure in vivo structure with high-throughput sequencing. However, these compounds have not been compared on an unbiased, raw-signal level. Here, we directly compare several in vivo SHAPE acylation reagents using the simple primer extension assay. We conclude that while multiple SHAPE technologies are effective at measuring purified RNAs in vitro, acylimidazole reagents NAI and NAI-N3 give markedly greater signals with lower background than 1M7 for in vivo measurement of the RNA structurome.

KEYWORDS:

RNA structure; SHAPE

PMID:
27879433
PMCID:
PMC5238792
DOI:
10.1261/rna.058784.116
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center