Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Cancer. 2016 Nov 22;115(11):1421-1429. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.324. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

Risk factors cannot explain the higher prevalence rates of precancerous colorectal lesions in men.

Author information

1
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deptartment of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
2
Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (OEGGH), Vienna, Austria.
3
Department of Clinical Biometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4
Main Association of the Austrian Social Insurance Institutions, Vienna, Austria.
5
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
6
Institute for Environmental Hygiene, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Prevalence of (pre)cancerous colorectal lesions are higher in men than in women, although transition rates from advanced lesions to cancer is similar in both sexes. Our aim was to investigate whether the sex-specific difference in incidence of premalignant colorectal lesions might be explained by the impact of risk factors.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study analysing health check-up examinations and screening colonoscopies performed within a national quality assurance program.

RESULTS:

A total of 25 409 patients were included in this study, 50.8% were women. Median age for both sexes was 60 years (interquartile range (IQR) 54-67). A multivariable model showed that risk factors mediated only 0.6 of the 10.4% gender gap in adenoma and 0.47 of the 3.2% gender gap in advanced adenoma detection rate. Smoking was the only independent risk factor with a varying sex-specific effect (men OR 1.46, CI 1.29, 1.64, women OR 1.76, CI 1.53, 2.06) and advanced adenomas (men OR 1.06, CI 0.80-1.42; women OR 2.08, CI 1.52-2.83). Independent risk factors for adenomas were BMI (OR 1.35 per IQR, CI 1.25-1.47) and triglyceride level (OR 1.03 per IQR, CI 1.00-1.06); for advanced adenomas physical activity (none vs regular: OR 1.54, CI 1.18-2.00, occasional vs regular: OR 1.17, CI 1.00-1.38), cholesterol level (OR 1.13 per IQR, CI 1.02-1.25), blood glucose level (OR 1.05 per IQR, CI 1.01-1.09) and alcohol score (OR 1.09 per IQR, CI 1.01-1.18).

CONCLUSIONS:

Risk factors cannot explain higher prevalence rates in men. Results of this study strongly underline the need for sex-specific screening recommendations.

PMID:
27764840
PMCID:
PMC5129825
DOI:
10.1038/bjc.2016.324
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Conflict of interest statement

Data on screening colonoscopy stem from the ‘Quality certificate for CRC prevention' founded by the Austrian Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the Federation of the Statutory Insurance Institutions and the Austrian Cancer Aid. This study was further supported by the Skoda Award of the Austrian Society of Internal Medicine (to MF).

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center