Format

Send to

Choose Destination
AIDS. 2016 Aug 24;30(13):2091-7. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001181.

Differential CD4+ cell count increase and CD4+ :  CD8+ ratio normalization with maraviroc compared with tenofovir.

Author information

1
aStatistical and Data Analysis Center, Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts bDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois cDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland dDivision of Infectious Diseases eDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism and Lipids, Emory University, Atlanta; Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia fHIV Research Branch, Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland gDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina hDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio iDivision of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Studies exploring the immunologic effects of maraviroc (MVC) have produced mixed results; hence, it remains unclear whether MVC has unique immunologic effects in comparison with other antiretroviral drugs. We sought to determine whether MVC has differential effects compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) during initial antiretroviral therapy.

DESIGN:

Prospective study in AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5303, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (N = 262) of MVC vs. TDF, each combined with boosted darunavir and emtricitabine.

METHODS:

A total of 31 cellular and soluble biomarkers were assayed at weeks 0 and 48. Polychromatic flow cytometry was performed on cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Soluble markers were assayed in plasma using ELISA kits. Analyses were as treated.

RESULTS:

Analyses included 230 participants (119 in MVC arm and 111 in TDF arm). Over 48 weeks of treatment, no significant differences were detected in declines in markers of inflammation and activation with MVC vs. TDF. A greater CD4 T-cell count increase (median +234 vs. +188 cells/μl, P = 0.036), a smaller CD8 T-cell count decrease (-6 vs. -109 cells/μl, P = 0.008), and a smaller CD4 : CD8 ratio increase (0.26 vs. 0.39, P = 0.003) occurred with MVC. Among participants with a baseline CD4 : CD8 ratio less than 1, a smaller proportion of MVC group normalized to a ratio greater than 1 at week 48 (15 and 36%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

MVC resulted in less improvement in the CD4 : CD8 ratio driven by greater increase in CD4 cell count but smaller decline in CD8 cell count. Changes in soluble or cellular biomarkers of inflammation and immune activation were not different between MVC and TDF.

PMID:
27281061
PMCID:
PMC4966543
DOI:
10.1097/QAD.0000000000001181
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Publication types, MeSH terms, Substances, Grant support

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grant support

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center