Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Apr;26(4):705-16. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

Randomized controlled study of early medication change for non-improvers to antidepressant therapy in major depression--The EMC trial.

Author information

1
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Mainz, Germany. Electronic address: tadic@uni-mainz.de.
2
Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Trials (IZKS), University Medical Center Mainz, Germany.
3
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of the University of Freiburg, Germany.
4
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, HELIOS Dr.-Horst-Schmidt-Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany.
5
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Mainz, Germany; Hospital for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Katzenelnbogen, Germany.
6
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Mainz, Germany.

Abstract

Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and no improvement after two weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy have a high risk of treatment failure. The aim of the study was to determine whether an early medication change (EMC) strategy is superior to a guideline-based treatment in MDD patients without improvement after two weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Eight-hundred-and-eighty-nine patients with MDD were enrolled, 879 patients received the SSRI escitalopram. Of those, 192 patients had no improvement, defined as a reduction of < 20% on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) after 14 days of treatment, and were randomly assigned to open treatment with the EMC strategy (n = 97; venlafaxine XR for study days 15-56; in case of sustained non-improvement on day 28, lithium augmentation for days 29-56) or TAU (n = 95; escitalopram continuation; non-responders on day 28 were switched to venlafaxine XR for four weeks, i.e. days 29-56). The primary outcome was remission (HAMD-17 ≤ 7) after 8 weeks of treatment as assessed by blinded raters. Remission rates were 24% for EMC and 16% for TAU, which was not significantly different (p = 0.2056). Sensitivity analyses for the primary and secondary effectiveness endpoints consistently showed favorable results for patients randomized to EMC. The results confirm data from post-hoc analyses of clinical trials showing that early non-improvement identifies patients who likely need alternate interventions. However, the herein used two-step switch/augmentation strategy for this risk group was not more effective than the control intervention. Alternate strategies and other design aspects are discussed in order to support researchers addressing the same research question.

KEYWORDS:

Antidepressant; Early improvement; Guidelines; Major Depressive Disorder; Pharmacotherapy; RCT

PMID:
26899588
DOI:
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.02.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center