Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Rehabil. 2016 Nov;30(11):1049-1059. doi: 10.1177/0269215515605553. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

Long-term effects of a progressive and specific balance-training programme with multi-task exercises for older adults with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled study.

Author information

1
1 Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
2
2 Department of Physical Therapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
3
3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
4
4 Technological Leadership Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
5
5 Recanati School for Community Health Professions, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate long-term effects of balance-training on concerns about falling, gait, balance performance, and physical function in older adults with osteoporosis and increased risk of falling.

DESIGN:

Randomized controlled trial, including three groups (training, training+physical activity, and control group), with follow-ups at three, nine, and 15 months. Short-term, three-month follow-up, benefits for those who fulfilled the first follow-up ( n = 69) have previously been reported.

SETTING:

Stockholm, Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 96 elderly, age 66-87, with verified osteoporosis.

INTERVENTIONS:

Balance-training programme including dual- and multitasks, with or without supplementary physical activity, three times/week over 12 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS:

Concerns about falling Falls Efficacy Scale -International (FES-I), walking at preferred speed with and without a cognitive dual-task and at fast speed, balance tests (one-leg stance and modified figure-of-eight), and physical function Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI).

RESULTS:

Participants in the training group maintained positive effects throughout the study period for concerns about falling (baseline vs. 15 months, median 27.5 vs. 23 points, p < 0.001) and walking performance (baseline vs. 15 months, p ⩽ 0.05 with an improvement of 0.9-1.4 m/s). The Training+physical activity group declined to baseline values at the nine-month follow-up, and were even lower at the 15-month follow-up for concerns about falling (median 26 vs. 26 points), walking performance (changes of -0.02 to 0.04 m/s), and physical function (mean 44.0 vs. 42.9 points). The control group remained unchanged throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS:

This balance-training programme reduced concerns about falling, and also improved gait in older adults with osteoporosis and increased risk of falling in a long-term perspective - important issues for fall prevention.

KEYWORDS:

Balance; fear of falling; long-term follow-up; osteoporosis; training

PMID:
26396164
DOI:
10.1177/0269215515605553
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center