Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Aug;17(8):555-62. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0413. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

A Minority of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Routinely Downloads and Retrospectively Reviews Device Data.

Author information

1
1 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and the Madison Clinic for Pediatric Diabetes, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California.
2
2 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine and Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In type 1 diabetes (T1D), periodic review of blood glucose and insulin dosing should be performed, but it is not known how often patients review these data on their own. We describe the proportion of patients with T1D who routinely downloaded and reviewed their data at home.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey of 155 adults and 185 caregivers of children with T1D at a single academic institution was performed. "Routine Downloaders" (downloaded four or more times in the past year) were also considered "Routine Reviewers" if they reviewed their data most of the time they downloaded from devices. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with being a Routine Reviewer.

RESULTS:

Only 31% of adults and 56% of caregivers reported ever downloading data from one or more devices, whereas 20% and 40%, respectively, were considered Routine Downloaders. Only 12% of adults and 27% of caregivers were Routine Reviewers. Mean hemoglobin A1c was lower in Routine Reviewers compared with non-Routine Reviewers (7.2±1.0% vs. 8.1±1.6% [P=0.03] in adults and 7.8±1.4% vs. 8.6±1.7% [P=0.001] in children). In adjusted analysis of adults, the odds ratio of being a Routine Reviewer of one or more devices for every 10-year increase in age was 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.1, 2.1 [P=0.02]). For every 10 years since diabetes diagnosis, the odds ratio of being a Routine Reviewer was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.2, 2.4 [P=0.01]). For caregivers, there were no statistically significant factors associated with being a Routine Reviewer.

CONCLUSIONS:

A minority of T1D patients routinely downloads and reviews data from their devices on their own. Further research is needed to understand obstacles, provide better education and tools for self-review, and determine if patient self-review is associated with improved glycemic control.

PMID:
26133226
PMCID:
PMC4529086
DOI:
10.1089/dia.2014.0413
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center