Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Cancer. 2014 Sep 9;111(6):1095-101. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.392. Epub 2014 Jul 17.

DNA methylation analysis in self-sampled brush material as a triage test in hrHPV-positive women.

Author information

1
Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
3
Department of Pathology, Cancer Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
4
Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5
Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
6
Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing in cervical cancer screening shows relatively low specificity, which makes triage testing necessary. In this study, DNA methylation analysis was compared with cytology for triage testing in hrHPV-positive women. Moreover, feasibility of DNA methylation analysis directly on brush-based self-sampled specimens was assessed.

METHODS:

Non-responding women from population-based screening were invited to self-collect a cervico-vaginal specimen for hrHPV testing; hrHPV-positive women were referred to a physician for triage liquid-based cytology. DNA methylation analysis was performed on 128 hrHPV-positive physician-collected triage samples and 50 matched brush self-samples with QMSP for C13ORF18, EPB41L3, JAM3 and TERT.

RESULTS:

In physician-taken triage material, DNA methylation analysis of JAM3 showed the highest combined specificity (88%) and sensitivity (82%) for detection of CIN3+, whereas cytology showed a specificity of 48% and a sensitivity of 91%. Out of 39 women with abnormal cytology and normal histology (false-positive by cytology), 87% were negative for JAM3 and 90% for C13ORF18 methylation. Agreement between DNA methylation analysis performed directly on the matched self-sampled material and physician-taken samples was 88% for JAM3 (κ=0.75, P<0.001) and 90% for C13ORF18 (κ=0.77; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

DNA methylation analysis as a triage test in hrHPV-positive women is an attractive alternative to cytology. Furthermore, DNA methylation is feasible directly on brush-based self-samplers and showed good correlation with matched physician-taken samples. Direct molecular triage on self-collected specimens could optimise the screening program, especially for non-responders, as this would eliminate the need for an additional physician-taken scraping for triage testing.

PMID:
25032730
PMCID:
PMC4453842
DOI:
10.1038/bjc.2014.392
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center