Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Same Test, Better Scores: Boosting the Reliability of Short Online Intelligence Recruitment Tests with Nested Logit Item Response Theory Models.

Storme M, Myszkowski N, Baron S, Bernard D.

J Intell. 2019 Jul 10;7(3). pii: E17. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7030017.

2.

Computer-Based Collaborative Problem Solving in PISA 2015 and the Role of Personality.

Stadler M, Herborn K, Mustafić M, Greiff S.

J Intell. 2019 Jul 1;7(3). pii: E15. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7030015.

3.

Searching for G: A New Evaluation of SPM-LS Dimensionality.

Garcia-Garzon E, Abad FJ, Garrido LE.

J Intell. 2019 Jun 28;7(3). pii: E14. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7030014.

4.

Special Issue "The Ability-Personality Integration".

Colom R, Bensch D, Horstmann KT, Wehner C, Ziegler M.

J Intell. 2019 Jun 25;7(2). pii: E13. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence7020013.

5.

gP for What is Common between Developing Intelligence and Personality: Response to the Commentators.

Demetriou A, Spanoudis G, Golino H.

J Intell. 2018 Dec 6;6(4). pii: E54. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040054.

6.

Commentary on Demetriou et al. (2018): Methodological and Theoretical Considerations.

Bäckström M.

J Intell. 2018 Dec 6;6(4). pii: E53. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040053.

7.

Mind-Personality Relations: Comment on Demetriou et al., 2018.

Ackerman PL.

J Intell. 2018 Dec 6;6(4). pii: E52. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040052.

8.

Mind-Personality Relations from Childhood to Early Adulthood.

Demetriou A, Spanoudis G, Žebec MS, Andreou M, Golino H, Kazi S.

J Intell. 2018 Dec 6;6(4). pii: E51. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040051.

9.

Does Intraindividual Variability of Personality States Improve Perspective Taking? An Ecological Approach Integrating Personality and Social Cognition.

Wundrack R, Prager J, Asselmann E, O'Connell G, Specht J.

J Intell. 2018 Nov 27;6(4). pii: E50. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040050. Review.

10.

Stronger Together: Personality, Intelligence and the Assessment of Career Potential.

Leutner F, Chamorro-Premuzic T.

J Intell. 2018 Nov 13;6(4). pii: E49. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040049.

11.

Which Cognitive Abilities Make the Difference? Predicting Academic Achievements in Advanced STEM Studies.

Berkowitz M, Stern E.

J Intell. 2018 Oct 26;6(4). pii: E48. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040048.

12.

Scoring Alternatives for Mental Speed Tests: Measurement Issues and Validity for Working Memory Capacity and the Attentional Blink Effect.

Schmitz F, Rotter D, Wilhelm O.

J Intell. 2018 Oct 15;6(4). pii: E47. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040047.

13.

Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000-2016) of Intelligence Articles.

Pesta B, Fuerst J, Kirkegaard EOW.

J Intell. 2018 Oct 15;6(4). pii: E46. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040046.

14.

Longitudinal IQ Trends in Children Diagnosed with Emotional Disturbance: An Analysis of Historical Data.

Kanaya T, Ceci SJ.

J Intell. 2018 Oct 8;6(4). pii: E45. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040045.

15.
16.

Non-g Factors Predict Educational and Occupational Criteria: More than g.

Coyle TR.

J Intell. 2018 Sep 7;6(3). pii: E43. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030043.

17.

Bifactor Models for Predicting Criteria by General and Specific Factors: Problems of Nonidentifiability and Alternative Solutions.

Eid M, Krumm S, Koch T, Schulze J.

J Intell. 2018 Sep 7;6(3). pii: E42. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030042.

18.
19.

Aligning Predictor-Criterion Bandwidths: Specific Abilities as Predictors of Specific Performance.

Wee S.

J Intell. 2018 Sep 7;6(3). pii: E40. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030040.

20.

The Great Debate: General Ability and Specific Abilities in the Prediction of Important Outcomes.

Kell HJ, Lang JWB.

J Intell. 2018 Sep 7;6(3). pii: E39. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030039.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center