Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1438-47. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1438.

Measurement of and reward for efficiency In California's pay-for-performance program.

Author information

1
Berkeley Center forHealth Technology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. james.robinson@berkeley.edu

Abstract

Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs are expanding their purview from quality to include efficiency, and many consider the episode of care as the appropriate unit of measurement. Two years' experience by the California P4P program, however, reveals that the requisite claims data often are incomplete or poorly coded and that even large physician groups have too few patients experiencing most types of episodes to permit statistically valid measurement for public reporting and incentive payment. The California P4P program is shifting its efficiency focus to metrics not reliant on episode measurement while shifting episode measurement to supporting bundled payment for acute surgical and medical interventions.

PMID:
19738261
DOI:
10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1438
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for eScholarship, California Digital Library, University of California
Loading ...
Support Center