Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Heart Rhythm. 2008 Apr;5(4):593-604. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.026. Epub 2008 Jan 29.

Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Author information

1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899. USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Defibrillation shock is known to induce atrial stunning, which is electrical and mechanical dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE:

We hypothesized that atrial stunning is caused by higher atrial susceptibility to electroporation vs ventricles. We also hypothesize that electroporation may be responsible for early recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS:

We investigated electroporation induced by 10-ms epicardial high-intensity shocks applied locally in atria and ventricles of Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 12) using optical mapping.

RESULTS:

Electroporation was centered at the electrode and was evident from transient diastolic depolarization and reduction of action potential amplitude and maximum upstroke derivative. Electroporation was voltage-dependent and polarity-dependent and was significantly more pronounced in the atria vs ventricles (P <.01), with a summary 50% of Effective Dose (ED50) for main measured parameters of 9.2 +/- 3.6 V/cm and 13.6 +/- 3.2 V/cm in the atria vs 37.4 +/- 1.5 V/cm and 48.4 +/- 2.8 V/cm in the ventricles, for anodal and cathodal stimuli, respectively. In atria (n = 5), shocks of both polarities (27.2 +/- 1.1 V/cm) transiently induced conduction block and reentry around the inexcitable area. Electroporation-induced ectopic activity was a possible trigger for reentry. However, in the thicker ventricles, electroporation and resulting conduction slowing and block were restricted to the surface only, preventing complete block and arrhythmia. The upstroke morphology revealed that the wave front dived below the electroporated region and resurfaced into unaffected epicardial tissue.

CONCLUSION:

We showed that the atria are more vulnerable to electroporation and resulting block and arrhythmia than the ventricles.

PMID:
18362029
PMCID:
PMC2365756
DOI:
10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.026
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center