Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Nature. 2018 May;557(7704):183-189. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0078-2. Epub 2018 May 2.

A midline thalamic circuit determines reactions to visual threat.

Author information

1
Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
2
Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. adh1@stanford.edu.
3
Stanford Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. adh1@stanford.edu.
4
BioX, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. adh1@stanford.edu.
5
Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. adh1@stanford.edu.

Abstract

How our internal state is merged with our visual perception of an impending threat to drive an adaptive behavioural response is not known. Mice respond to visual threats by either freezing or seeking shelter. Here we show that nuclei of the ventral midline thalamus (vMT), the xiphoid nucleus (Xi) and nucleus reuniens (Re), represent crucial hubs in the network controlling behavioural responses to visual threats. The Xi projects to the basolateral amygdala to promote saliency-reducing responses to threats, such as freezing, whereas the Re projects to the medial prefrontal cortex (Re→mPFC) to promote saliency-enhancing, even confrontational responses to threats, such as tail rattling. Activation of the Re→mPFC pathway also increases autonomic arousal in a manner that is rewarding. The vMT is therefore important for biasing how internal states are translated into opposing categories of behavioural responses to perceived threats. These findings may have implications for understanding disorders of arousal and adaptive decision-making, such as phobias, post-traumatic stress and addictions.

Comment in

PMID:
29720647
DOI:
10.1038/s41586-018-0078-2
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center